- Mar 13, 2006
- 10,140
- 819
- 126
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...le-sitting-in-a-police-vehicle-officials-say/
Let the victim blaming begin!
Let the victim blaming begin!
Innocent bystander was shot. Police bullets?
A third party was shot when they were pursuing the suspect. I believe he is asking if it's been determined whose gun the shots game from.Are you on crack or meth this week?
A third party was shot when they were pursuing the suspect. I believe he is asking if it's been determined whose gun the shots game from.
Do you want to know if the innocent bystander was shot by the cops or not?
Only Blue Lives Matter?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...le-sitting-in-a-police-vehicle-officials-say/
Let the victim blaming begin!
Bystander wasn't killed, let alone assassinated.
Bystander wasn't killed, let alone assassinated.
Can you at least try to be a little transparent? You're not even trying. BTW, both cop and killer are black. Go ahead and spin that to be racist.
Nope! The person who did this is a criminal. Criminals get chased down and if they don't get shot resisting arrest they're arrested, tried, found guilty and put in prison.
As opposed to people who shoot people who pose no threat to them but do so while wearing a police uniform. Those people get indicted, get a paid vacation, occasionally get wildly successful gofundme campaigns, and maybe if they're incredibly unlucky actually get tried.
People will treat these two things as being exactly equal and overlook the difference between the results or that police are entrusted to protect and serve, theoretically someone other than themselves.
Death is death, and is what police should be trying to prevent, not cause.
Bystander was shot. By pure luck he wasn't killed.
We already know the guy shot police, and in return he got killed. The main question remaining is who shot the innocent bystander.
The cops won't tell us if it was them until some internal investigation that takes a year when everyone has forgotten about it. But we need to be immediately outraged that one of theirs got shot and suck up their side of the story.I know, you're clicking links like crazy hoping it was a cop. Release the rage, asshole.
The cops won't tell us if it was them until some internal investigation that takes a year when everyone has forgotten about it. But we need to be immediately outraged that one of theirs got shot and suck up their side of the story.
I am upset an innocent bystander got shot and the media doesn't care who shot him.Aha, there we go. Cop killed in cold blood, and your not upset because a person was killed, but because "one of theirs" (whatever that means) gets in the news.
And here we are, the first! 12 posts to "cop deserved it".
What a fucking lowlife you are.
Aha, there we go. Cop killed in cold blood, and your not upset because a person was killed, but because "one of theirs" (whatever that means) gets in the news.
Can we get back on track, please?
It's possible to sympathize with more than one camp here, and it's okay to not have all the answers right away. You can mourn the officer's death while still supporting Black Lives Matter; you can be concerned about the injured bystander without assuming that it's due to either fiendish police recklessness or an out-of-control gunman.
