Oh, okay then. 🙂
I paid around $200 for a Q6600 in 2008, and ark lists the E6400 at $128. I guess there was a price drop. (!)
Yes. I believe the E6300 was a little cheaper at the time (~$180) but there was enough performance delta to warrant the marginal cost increase.
Over the years I had considered doing a small upgrade to something like a Q6600, but I could never find it for the right price.
I know Photoshop is OpenGL accelerated. Can Intel's HD Graphics P4600 handle this?
Warranties are nice, but RMAs take time. Who knows, you might want to check the tracking number online while you're waiting for the new card to show up.
I'd also assume they'd want you to do basic troubleshooting before they approve a replacement card.
That's actually a good point. The last time I had to go through RMA, the turnaround was a little more than two weeks. My computer was pretty useless. :S
Both. Yes, I'm talking about having the iGPU as a backup, but I'm also talking about things like buying a well-designed case instead of the cheapest thing you can find, or buying a baggie of thumbscrews to keep in the desk drawer. Or a nice set of screwdrivers. Or a backup hard drive. Whatever kinds of things strike you as potentially handy.
I thought about re-using my Lian-Li case, but it isn't tool-less. It actually has a mounting bracket for floppy disks! Do you have any modern case recommendations?
Sadly I do keep all my tools/paste/etc. in a baggie of sorts, with the thumb screws and other minute accessories.
I have several 7200 RPM internal hard drives which I use for general file backup including a 1 TB and a couple of 320 GB.
Well, given that, and given your budget, then an i7 or Xeon E3 wouldn't be out of line at all.
Do you think the improved TIM and other benefits that Intel has touted is worth the premium over the Xeon E3 I linked, iGPU notwithstanding?
discrete and integrated gpus do not interfere with eachother in modern os. The same way you can have 3 audio sources (GPU, integrated and soundcard) you can have multiple video sources as well, and assign them to handle different tasks. It's the same as running an extra (crappy) GPU for Phys-X. You assign the part a job and that job is isolated from the job of the main GPU.
I do have a Creative X-Fi Elite sound card which I got really cheaply at the time. I've used since shortly after I built my computer in 2007. I've never tried to mix audio sources because I've always disabled on-board sound in my BIOS and never installed the GPU audio when I got my GeForce 450 GTS replacement.
😉
I knew you could safely use multiple GPUs if they are the same brand (high-end GeForce with a low-end GeForce), but not mix brands because of driver issues between AMD and Nvidia.
In that case I don't see anything wrong with a 4790K, or just a regular non-K 4790. Just for a bit of future proofing.
I'm only considering Devil's Canyon because of the performance I'm likely to get out of it. Otherwise, I would lean towards a cheaper Xeon unless I really want the iGPU.
Intel actually made Quicksync available on Haswell Pentium/Celerons recently. That said x86-based encoding is still the gold standard for quality.
I'm a firm believer that software algorithms do a better job than hardware algorithms. You trade off speed for quality, but I'll do that every time.
You'll properly be amazed just how much faster a 4790(K) can do x264 encoding compared to your E6400. We're talking perhaps an order of magnitude...
You have no idea how excited I will be to test it out myself. When you factor in the clock speeds (2.133 GHz vs 3.4-4.4 GHz) and then the microarchitectures, I could easily see my encoding speed increase tenfold.
I think a GTX750TI would be a good fit for you. It is extremely efficient, low power and as a bonus has partial x265 (no, that's not a typo) hardware decoding. Its currently the only card on the market with that capability.
I generally like to buy a GPU and then ride it out. Do you think it would be a safe purchase now if Maxwell is on the horizon. What about Mantle support for AMD cards? DX12 seems like it's a long time away.
I'm still using my same monitor, a Samsung 204B, which has a 1600x1200 resolution, if you can believe it. That's about the same number of pixels to be pushed as 1080p gaming. If I go to something like a 2560x1440/1600 monitor, how future proofed will I be with the 750Ti?
I have no intentions to upgrade to an Eyefinity/triple monitor/4K resolution monitor any time in the next few years.
Don't RAID SSDs. Just don't. You'll never notice the additional performance, and you have twice the risk of drive failure. Besides, for the same price you can get a single large drive with the same capacity. Larger capacity drives also perform better then smaller drives. (larger capacity=more dies, more dies=higher performance)
RAID is also not a substitute for proper backup.
What should I do with my extra SSD? I don't keep any valuable files on my SSD, just games and other program installation files.
I believe the 830 Pro 256 GB has the same performance as the 512 GB model.