British Soldiers forced Iraqi POWS to BJ them!

[SnapIT]

Originally posted by: Dari

Originally posted by: Moralpanic

Originally posted by: dpm

Originally posted by: Dari
These pics have to be seen to be believed. What man would honestly put another man's dick into his mouth and begin oral sex? I wouldn't scoop that low even with the barrel of a smith & wesson pointed at me. But if it is true, then this just another example of the prevalent homosexual tendencies that I saw in europeans on my trip there last year (yes, even among the british). They may be on an island, but they're not that far from the mainland.

LOL Dari, what exactly happened on your trip to Europe? Did you 'accidentally' wander into a gay nightclub and get chatted up?

You know what they say - people who go on about homosexuality too much are just trying to repress their real feelings

LOL yeah, where'd you go? Ibiza?

I'm not trying to suppress any damn feelings. I took this vacation last year with my gf all over western europe. to make a long story short, I was shocked to see so many effeminate (sic?) men. men wearing pink. men wearing tights. men hitting on other men. men chasing other men. they ate. they laughed. they talked aloud about their personal matters. some of the streets smelled of open ass. aside from the fact that many of the natives couldn't speak english, this was the only thing confused me and put a (bit of a) downer on the trip. My girlfriend had a great time though.

I don't know wheter to flame you or laugh at you.... exactly where did you go? nevermind... *points and laughs*

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Carbonyl

The documents later were judged forgeries.

Who forged them? Why hav'nt we heard more about this? Sh1t should be hitting the fan if true.

I can't and won't defend the repeated use of bad intelligence, but at the time "someone" or "someones" determined the info credible enough to pass inspite the CIA's suspicion. Those people who made that decision should be held responsible.

I never claimed bush was perfect, but that was harldy an ass whoopin rchiu

CkG

 

[cpumaster]

CkG, maybe you should go back to the education thread, at least you have valid logical point on that issue, here, your defend Bush 100% attitude just make you sound like an idiot at best, or a lying war maniac like Rummsy or wolfowitz at worst... remember the day democrat try to defend Clinton at all cost?

 

[Gaard]

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: Carbonyl

The documents later were judged forgeries.

Who forged them? Why hav'nt we heard more about this? Sh1t should be hitting the fan if true.

I can't and won't defend the repeated use of bad intelligence, but at the time "someone" or "someones" determined the info credible enough to pass inspite the CIA's suspicion. Those people who made that decision should be held responsible.

I never claimed bush was perfect, but that was harldy an ass whoopin rchiu

CkG

Yet you have absolutely no qualms about accepting the following with no raised eyebrows or questions?
President Bush - "We have solid evidence of the existence of WMD. No, we can't say what kind of evidence it is. Nor can we show it to you. Nor can we divulge exactly what kind of weapon it is. (so that when we find it the American people can say 'Yep, that's what he said was there') If I do any of the above, it may be enough to reveal our sources. You'll just have to trust me."

I've asked twice now CAD, yet you refuse to answer. Do you deny that WMD was the primary reason for waging this war?