• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Brit Hume Calls Upon Tiger Woods To Convert To Christianity. Really.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
It's very amusing to see all the usual suspects stop slamming Christianity long enough to slam a Christian for suggesting that his religion might be more comforting and supportive than another. I see now that it's wrong to suggest that one religion might be better than another, but right to suggest that one religion (or all religions) is worse.
 
It's very amusing to see all the usual suspects stop slamming Christianity long enough to slam a Christian for suggesting that his religion might be more comforting and supportive than another. I see now that it's wrong to suggest that one religion might be better than another, but right to suggest that one religion (or all religions) is worse.

Yes, shame on all you "usual suspects" for bashing a Christian while he is busy bashing a Buddhist. Have you no sense of fair play!!!! He has his right to his personal opinion and the right to spout it on national TV.
 
Brit Hume has a much better understanding of the belief differences between Buddhism and Christianity than anyone posting here... Aren't there any practicing Buddhists posting here that can confirm that? I thought not.

Leave it to Ann Coulter to cut through the dreck -

IF YOU CAN FIND A BETTER DEAL, TAKE IT!
by Ann Coulter
January 6, 2010

Someone mentioned Christianity on television recently and liberals reacted with their usual howls of rage and blinking incomprehension.

On a Fox News panel discussing Tiger Woods, Brit Hume said, perfectly accurately:

"The extent to which he can recover, it seems to me, depends on his faith. He is said to be a Buddhist. I don't think that faith offers the kind of forgiveness and redemption that is offered by the Christian faith. So, my message to Tiger would be, 'Tiger, turn to the Christian faith and you can make a total recovery and be a great example to the world."

Hume's words, being 100 percent factually correct, sent liberals into a tizzy of sputtering rage, once again illustrating liberals' copious ignorance of Christianity. (Also illustrating the words of the Bible: "How is it you do not understand me when I speak? It is because you cannot bear to listen to my words." John 8:43.)

In The Washington Post, Tom Shales demanded that Hume apologize, saying he had "dissed about half a billion Buddhists on the planet."

Is Buddhism about forgiveness? Because, if so, Buddhists had better start demanding corrections from every book, magazine article and blog posting ever written on the subject, which claims Buddhists don't believe in God, but try to become their own gods.

I can't imagine that anyone thinks Tiger's problem was that he didn't sufficiently think of himself as a god, especially after that final putt in the Arnold Palmer Invitational last year.

In light of Shales' warning Hume about "what people are saying" about him, I hope Hume's a Christian, but that's not apparent from his inarguable description of Christianity. Of course, given the reaction to his remarks, apparently one has to be a regular New Testament scholar to have so much as a passing familiarity with the basic concept of Christianity.

On MSNBC, David Shuster invoked the "separation of church and television" (a phrase that also doesn't appear in the Constitution), bitterly complaining that Hume had brought up Christianity "out-of-the-blue" on "a political talk show."

Why on earth would Hume mention religion while discussing a public figure who had fallen from grace and was in need of redemption and forgiveness? Boy, talk about coming out of left field!

What religion -- what topic -- induces this sort of babbling idiocy? (If liberals really want to keep people from hearing about God, they should give Him his own show on MSNBC.)

Most perplexing was columnist Dan Savage's indignant accusation that Hume was claiming that Christianity "offers the best deal -- it gives you the get-out-of-adultery-free card that other religions just can't."

In fact, that's exactly what Christianity does. It's the best deal in the universe. (I know it seems strange that a self-described atheist and "radical sex advice columnist lovely human" like Savage would miss the central point of Christianity, but there it is.)

God sent his only son to get the crap beaten out of him, die for our sins and rise from the dead. If you believe that, you're in. Your sins are washed away from you -- sins even worse than adultery! -- because of the cross.

"He canceled the record of the charges against us and took it away by nailing it to the cross." Colossians 2:14.

Surely you remember the cross, liberals -- the symbol banned by ACLU lawsuits from public property throughout the land?

Christianity is simultaneously the easiest religion in the world and the hardest religion in the world.

In the no-frills, economy-class version, you don't need a church, a teacher, candles, incense, special food or clothing; you don't need to pass a test or prove yourself in any way. All you'll need is a Bible (in order to grasp the amazing deal you're getting) and probably a water baptism, though even that's disputed.

You can be washing the dishes or walking your dog or just sitting there minding your business hating Susan Sarandon and accept that God sent his only son to die for your sins and rise from the dead ... and you're in!

"Because, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved." Romans 10:9.

If you do that, every rotten, sinful thing you've ever done is gone from you. You're every bit as much a Christian as the pope or Billy Graham.

No fine print, no "your mileage may vary," no blackout dates. God ought to do a TV spot: "I'm God Almighty, and if you can find a better deal than the one I'm offering, take it."

The Gospel makes this point approximately 1,000 times. Here are a few examples at random:

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life." John 3:16.

"For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God." Ephesians 2:8.

"For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." Romans 6:23.

In a boiling rage, liberals constantly accuse Christians of being "judgmental." No, we're relieved.

Christianity is also the hardest religion in the world because, if you believe Christ died for your sins and rose from the dead, you have no choice but to give your life entirely over to Him. No more sexual promiscuity, no lying, no cheating, no stealing, no killing inconvenient old people or unborn babies -- no doing what all the other kids do.

And no more caring what the world thinks of you -- because, as Jesus warned in a prophecy constantly fulfilled by liberals: The world will hate you.

With Christianity, your sins are forgiven, the slate is wiped clean and your eternal life is guaranteed through nothing you did yourself, even though you don't deserve it. It's the best deal in the universe.
 
Brit Hume has a much better understanding of the belief differences between Buddhism and Christianity than anyone posting here... Aren't there any practicing Buddhists posting here that can confirm that? I thought not.

Leave it to Ann Coulter to cut through the dreck -

Don't you find it kinda weird that she assumes all Christians are conservative, and all liberals hate Christianity? Also if she is a practicing Christian she really needs to cut back on the amount of hatred she is spewing.
 
Don't you find it kinda weird that she assumes all Christians are conservative, and all liberals hate Christianity? Also if she is a practicing Christian she really needs to cut back on the amount of hatred she is spewing.

Ann Coulter assumes a lot of things - makes it easier for her to paint all liberals as the same for her strawman rants.
 
Ann Coulter as a credible source?

Someone should tell her to look up Karma to have a better understanding of Buddhist faith.

I also didn't know that you could just choose Christianity as the faith-du jour and get your "get out of Hell free card". I thought you needed an epiphany or some such for it to work.

I still don't think Hume was trying to save his soul, but telling him that the American public would forgive him if he became a Christian.
 
Don't you find it kinda weird that she assumes all Christians are conservative, and all liberals hate Christianity? Also if she is a practicing Christian she really needs to cut back on the amount of hatred she is spewing.

I pretty much think that liberals/progressives, and, by extrapolation from the postings here, atheists, pretty much hate all religions other than their own. I tend to look to the deaths of millions under the state religion of atheism in the Soviet Union as a particularly good confirming example.

You must not actually read what Coulter writes. Her commentary almost always consists of pointing out the foibles and hypocrisy of liberals. Is pointing out their ongoing stupidity an expression of hatred?
 
Is Buddhism about forgiveness? Because, if so, Buddhists had better start demanding corrections from every book, magazine article and blog posting ever written on the subject, which claims Buddhists don't believe in God, but try to become their own gods.
That just rubs me wrong, unless it's absolutely true... guess I've a little bit of reading to do before I get back to this subject.

*edit

Having done just a couple minutes of reading I've come to a conclusion. Do Coulter and Hume suggest Christians only forgive other Christians and thus this nation will only forgive him as such? If this is the case then it is more offensive than I originally thought, and not just the original comment either but it seems the backup material they bring forth just makes matters worse.
 
Last edited:
Brit Hume has a much better understanding of the belief differences between Buddhism and Christianity than anyone posting here... Aren't there any practicing Buddhists posting here that can confirm that? I thought not.

Leave it to Ann Coulter to cut through the dreck -
Leave it to PJABBER to quote Ann Coulter and expect people to take him seriously🙄
 
Leave it to PJABBER to quote Ann Coulter and expect people to take him seriously🙄

I find Coulter funny, just like you get your chuckles from Olbermann and Maddow.

The difference between the two sets is that Coulter tends to be 99.5% accurate, while your comedians are just angry.
 
I find Coulter funny, just like you get your chuckles from Olbermann and Maddow.

The difference between the two sets is that Coulter tends to be 99.5% accurate, while your comedians are just angry.

Lol I don't know anyone who watches Olbermann. Maddow - I only know one. From the few clips I've seen, Maddow relies on the cynical "heh heh" kind of humor. Maddow angry though? You are saying this when Coulter has written numerous books belittling people of an entire political ideology - simply because they believe differently. Just look at a few of her more recent works:

"Godless"
"If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans"

Also, if you want anger, listen to Savage or Levin. There is simply no equivalent on the liberal political spectrum. If I want to, I can listen to them everyday on 630AM, since Levin is on during my evening commute. And that's not even mentioning the more mainstream angry talking heads like Rush.
 
LOL, oh Brit... trying to stoke your ratings with the holy roller crowd are we?

Mainstream christianity really has some insecurities about Buddhism, seen it exhibited many many times, but how funny is it to see him pander to the Faux crowd like "forgiveness" is some unique trait enjoyed only by the Mithra/Horus/Jesus fans?

I think it's horribly appropriate that a Faux news guy acts like there hasn't been a truckload of self-promoting christians who have been caught in worse situations than Tiger's.

He needs the forgiveness of his wife and family. Forgiveness from anthropomorphic constructs, not so much.
 
It's very amusing to see all the usual suspects stop slamming Christianity long enough to slam a Christian for suggesting that his religion might be more comforting and supportive than another. I see now that it's wrong to suggest that one religion might be better than another, but right to suggest that one religion (or all religions) is worse.

At least you acknowledge that that is exactly what he was saying. Some people haven't quite made that recognition and we can't debate appropriateness until we're talking about the same plainly made assertion.
 
Lol I don't know anyone who watches Olbermann. Maddow - I only know one. From the few clips I've seen, Maddow relies on the cynical "heh heh" kind of humor. Maddow angry though? You are saying this when Coulter has written numerous books belittling people of an entire political ideology - simply because they believe differently. Just look at a few of her more recent works:

"Godless"
"If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans"

Also, if you want anger, listen to Savage or Levin. There is simply no equivalent on the liberal political spectrum. If I want to, I can listen to them everyday on 630AM, since Levin is on during my evening commute. And that's not even mentioning the more mainstream angry talking heads like Rush.

You are right. The ratings show that MSNBC political talking heads have very low viewership. You really have to be a masochist to sit through the Olbermann's daily hate fest. Maddow should be a science reporter as those are the only times her smarminess and "holier than thou" attitude gets some relief. I channel flip political news so I catch some of the shenanigans on all sides.

Coulter most definitely belittles liberals. That is her schtick. She does so with a wickedly pointed wit and, if you actually read her books and articles, you will find that she usually does an excellent job of pointing out in detail where she finds the factual basis for her commentary.

I tend to mostly listen to financial news and commentary and channel surf while driving. Savage doesn't catch my interest much, though I have listened to Mark Levin once in a while. Rush and Hannity bore me. When the self-serving indignation gets to be too much I switch off.

FWIW, I find that Coulter, Michelle Malkin and Glen Beck generally do an excellent job of documenting their facts and how they come to their opinions. You might agree or disagree with their opinions, but they are likely to be solidly detailed with their data and source references.
 
The idea that all religions are equal is not correct. This idea that all religions lead to God is silly. This is a contest, my friends. Those of you that advocate for your false path, are in the way. There will be judgement in your future. It might not be today but it will be. You will kneel before a holy God and be judged. Every singled event, thought and act of your time on earth is being recorded. The evidence will be sure. Those of you who know the power of the microchip and the transfer of information know that this is possible.

The Spirit of Man is eternal. Only one source of power will insure eternal life and victory. That source is Jesus.

Do we need endless debate about that? No. The fact is, there will be losers in this great theater that all Men participate in.

Join the victors, join up with Jesus. Wash away every foul act and have them expunged from the record by the Blood.

Stand before God and be able to answer with power, conviction and force of Law, I am innocent!
 
I pretty much think that liberals/progressives, and, by extrapolation from the postings here, atheists, pretty much hate all religions other than their own. I tend to look to the deaths of millions under the state religion of atheism in the Soviet Union as a particularly good confirming example.

You must not actually read what Coulter writes. Her commentary almost always consists of pointing out the foibles and hypocrisy of liberals. Is pointing out their ongoing stupidity an expression of hatred?

You take people pointing your ongoing stupidity and hypocrisy as an expression of hatred so I guess from your point of view it would have to be right?
 
Who the fuck is Brit Hume?

You people spend entirely too much time listening to talking heads.

I prefer to spend my time listening to Talking Heads.
 
This thread has turned into a pretty awesome explosion of crazy/retarded. You have PJABBER as usual quoting ultra right editorials, but even better this time... claiming Glenn Beck's ideas are solidly sourced. Then we have the religious crazies coming in and telling us that God's recording us like one big CCTV system with the world's biggest and fastest SSD so that he can play back our sins for us. (and that we know it because of the power of the microchip)

I just want to thank all the crazies for making this thread extremely funny to read.
 
You take people pointing your ongoing stupidity and hypocrisy as an expression of hatred so I guess from your point of view it would have to be right?

That is somewhat of an incoherent sentence.

Are you trying to say that you hate me?
 
Back
Top