Originally posted by: DieselUV
didn't she own him? she didn't get owned
and this isn't very suprising, I bet it happens every day at the airport.
Originally posted by: DieselUV
didn't she own him? she didn't get owned
Originally posted by: andylawcc
Originally posted by: DieselUV
didn't she own him? she didn't get owned
and this isn't very suprising, I bet it happens every day at the airport.
Originally posted by: AgaBooga
Originally posted by: DWWKind of funny, but what do you deserve for a 4 day courtship?
That is invalid argument.
Originally posted by: HardcoreRobot
Can wives sue husband for rape? IIRC there is (or was) a law in texas that basically said wives were mens sexual property and couldnt refuse.
he should get his moneys worth before they ship her sorry ass back
Doesn't seem like tooo hard of a decision 😛Parmar and Jaswal divorced last December. The Canada Border Services Agency must now determine if she should be deported.
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Yossarian
" The Canada Border Services Agency must now determine if she should be deported."
tough call there.
not really.
She lied to the guy. She only married him to get to the country. She refuses to consummate the marriage. He divorce's her for deceiving him. She should not get citizenship at all.
deport her A$$ back and make her pay for the ticket.
Hey... India has been improving quite a bit in many aspects recently...Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: AgaBooga
Originally posted by: DWWKind of funny, but what do you deserve for a 4 day courtship?
That is invalid argument.
Oh no it's not. It pretty much sums up how incredibly stupid Indian culture is in the 21st century concerning the issue of marriage. Maybe they should spend more time trying to improve their country than trying to find ways to offload their citizens on other countries that have put in the blood, sweat, and effort to do so.
Originally posted by: AgaBooga
Originally posted by: DWWKind of funny, but what do you deserve for a 4 day courtship?
That is invalid argument.
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: AgaBooga
Originally posted by: DWWKind of funny, but what do you deserve for a 4 day courtship?
That is invalid argument.
Why? 4-day courtship isn't NEARLY enough to know the person or their motives.
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: AgaBooga
Originally posted by: DWWKind of funny, but what do you deserve for a 4 day courtship?
That is invalid argument.
Why? 4-day courtship isn't NEARLY enough to know the person or their motives.
One of my best friend's (girl, east indian) parents were arranged and met on the altar. They're still together ~30 years later and in love. Arranged marriages work more often that non-arranged actually. It's because here guy marries girl, but there, guy's family joins girl's family through guy and girl. The entire family works things out together.
But yeah, guy was stupid, chick was a bitch, I hope she gets deported.
Originally posted by: UlricT
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: AgaBooga
Originally posted by: DWWKind of funny, but what do you deserve for a 4 day courtship?
That is invalid argument.
Why? 4-day courtship isn't NEARLY enough to know the person or their motives.
One of my best friend's (girl, east indian) parents were arranged and met on the altar. They're still together ~30 years later and in love. Arranged marriages work more often that non-arranged actually. It's because here guy marries girl, but there, guy's family joins girl's family through guy and girl. The entire family works things out together.
But yeah, guy was stupid, chick was a bitch, I hope she gets deported.
This reminds me of something a grand-uncle of mine in TX told me once. He said that most americans fall in love and then get married, but most indians get married and then fall in love. The latter has always lasted longer on average.
Thinking about it, I realised that it was because people went into arranged marriages with little expectations. As you get to know the person better, each likeable trait is like a new surprise. On the other hand, being head over heels in love while getting married means that you only see the good parts of a person, and are blind to everything else.
Originally posted by: UlricT
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: AgaBooga
Originally posted by: DWWKind of funny, but what do you deserve for a 4 day courtship?
That is invalid argument.
Why? 4-day courtship isn't NEARLY enough to know the person or their motives.
One of my best friend's (girl, east indian) parents were arranged and met on the altar. They're still together ~30 years later and in love. Arranged marriages work more often that non-arranged actually. It's because here guy marries girl, but there, guy's family joins girl's family through guy and girl. The entire family works things out together.
But yeah, guy was stupid, chick was a bitch, I hope she gets deported.
This reminds me of something a grand-uncle of mine in TX told me once. He said that most americans fall in love and then get married, but most indians get married and then fall in love. The latter has always lasted longer on average.
Thinking about it, I realised that it was because people went into arranged marriages with little expectations. As you get to know the person better, each likeable trait is like a new surprise. On the other hand, being head over heels in love while getting married means that you only see the good parts of a person, and are blind to everything else.
I have to agree. In the 60s and 70s divorce rates in the US shot way up. It wasn't because all those women suddenly became unhappy, but because it was finally socially acceptable to get divorced.Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: UlricT
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: AgaBooga
Originally posted by: DWWKind of funny, but what do you deserve for a 4 day courtship?
That is invalid argument.
Why? 4-day courtship isn't NEARLY enough to know the person or their motives.
One of my best friend's (girl, east indian) parents were arranged and met on the altar. They're still together ~30 years later and in love. Arranged marriages work more often that non-arranged actually. It's because here guy marries girl, but there, guy's family joins girl's family through guy and girl. The entire family works things out together.
But yeah, guy was stupid, chick was a bitch, I hope she gets deported.
This reminds me of something a grand-uncle of mine in TX told me once. He said that most americans fall in love and then get married, but most indians get married and then fall in love. The latter has always lasted longer on average.
Thinking about it, I realised that it was because people went into arranged marriages with little expectations. As you get to know the person better, each likeable trait is like a new surprise. On the other hand, being head over heels in love while getting married means that you only see the good parts of a person, and are blind to everything else.
This is probably due to the culture - a divorce is a shameful act...it's not because an arranged marriage is somehow better, IMO.
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: UlricT
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: AgaBooga
Originally posted by: DWWKind of funny, but what do you deserve for a 4 day courtship?
That is invalid argument.
Why? 4-day courtship isn't NEARLY enough to know the person or their motives.
One of my best friend's (girl, east indian) parents were arranged and met on the altar. They're still together ~30 years later and in love. Arranged marriages work more often that non-arranged actually. It's because here guy marries girl, but there, guy's family joins girl's family through guy and girl. The entire family works things out together.
But yeah, guy was stupid, chick was a bitch, I hope she gets deported.
This reminds me of something a grand-uncle of mine in TX told me once. He said that most americans fall in love and then get married, but most indians get married and then fall in love. The latter has always lasted longer on average.
Thinking about it, I realised that it was because people went into arranged marriages with little expectations. As you get to know the person better, each likeable trait is like a new surprise. On the other hand, being head over heels in love while getting married means that you only see the good parts of a person, and are blind to everything else.
This is probably due to the culture - a divorce is a shameful act...it's not because an arranged marriage is somehow better, IMO.
This is probably due to the culture - a divorce is a shameful act...it's not because an arranged marriage is somehow better, IMO.
Thinking about it, I realised that it was because people went into arranged marriages with little expectations. As you get to know the person better, each likeable trait is like a new surprise. On the other hand, being head over heels in love while getting married means that you only see the good parts of a person, and are blind to everything else.