• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Breaking news: U.S. Files Antitrust Complaint to Block AT&T, T-Mobile Merger

lothar

Diamond Member
U.S. Files Antitrust Complaint to Block AT&T, T-Mobile Merger
The U.S. government sued to blockAT&T Inc. (T)’s proposed $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile USA Inc., saying the deal would “substantially lessen competition”in the wireless market. AT&T shares fell as much as 5 percent.
In the complaint filed today in federal court inWashington, the U.S. is seeking a declaration that Dallas-based AT&T’s takeover of T-Mobile, a unit of Deutsche Telekom AG (DTE), would violate U.S. antitrust law. The U.S. also asked for a court order blocking any arrangement implementing the deal.
“AT&T’s elimination of T-Mobile as an independent, low-priced rival would remove a significant competitive force from the market,” the U.S. said in its filing.
Should regulators reject the deal, which would create the biggest U.S. wireless carrier, AT&T would have to pay Deutsche Telekom $3 billion in cash. It would also provide T-Mobile USAwith wireless spectrum in some regions and reduced charges for calls into AT&T’s network, for a total package valued at as much as $7 billion, Deutsche Telekom said this month.
Philipp Schindera, a spokesman at Bonn-based Deutsche Telekom, declined to immediately comment on the filing. Jessica Smith, a Justice Department spokeswoman, declined to comment on the suit. Michael Balmoris, an AT&T spokesman, didn’t immediately respond to an e-mail and phone calls seeking comment.

Shares Drop
AT&T fell $1.02, or 3.4 percent, to $28.60 at 10:55 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading after declining as much as $1.49. Deutsche Telekom American depositary receipts dropped as much as 6.4 percent, to $12.93.
The purchase of Bellevue, Washington-based T-Mobile would combine the second- and fourth-largest carriers to create a new market leader ahead of No. 1 Verizon Wireless. The new company would have dwarfed current No. 3 carrier Sprint Nextel Corp., which argued against the deal. Overland Park, Kansas-based Sprint’s shares jumped as much as 9.9 percent.
Some U.S. lawmakers have said the deal may reduce competition and raise consumer costs. The Federal Communications Commission has given itself more time to study new data presented by AT&T.

Economic Models
AT&T in a July 25 filing at the FCC submitted new economic models that it said showed the merger would lower prices and increase service in large metropolitan markets. The models offer“further detailed support” for arguments that the merger will lessen strains on the company’s wireless network, lower costs and increase quality, AT&T said in the filing.
“Given the size of the cancellation fee that was negotiated into his agreement, AT&T has the incentive to fight,”said Andrew Gavil, a law professor at Howard University in Washington. “The fact that the Justice Department is challenging the deal doesn’t mean they won’t negotiate a resolution at some point.”
The case is U.S. v. AT&T Inc., 11-01560, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Washington).
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...t-to-block-proposed-at-t-t-mobile-merger.html

Mods, feel free to update this post and add more sources if more detailed news comes out throughout the day/week because I won't be on all day today and I'm travelling this weekend to my 3rd world country and might not access the internet.
I'm on my way to DC for the next 2 hours and I still have to work 2-10pm later today.
 
Last edited:
Nice! AT&T claimed this was to build their 4G network, but that leaked email revealed they were paying a huge price premium for it solely to keep T-Mobile out of Sprint's hands. They obviously have anti-competitive motives at heart.
 
Awesome! I hate AT&T with the fire of 10000000 burning suns, but keep it for the family plan I'm on. If it wasn't heavily subsidized by discounts & employer contributions I'd drop them like 3rd period French.
 
As a ATT customer this makes me so damn happy. ATT charges an outragous ammount right now could not of imagined how bad it would be if the merger goes though. Justice served as far as I am concerned. Just wish any other carrier had good coverage in my area.
 
Nice! AT&T claimed this was to build their 4G network, but that leaked email revealed they were paying a huge price premium for it solely to keep T-Mobile out of Sprint's hands. They obviously have anti-competitive motives at heart.

And you don't think Sprint wouldn't have anti-competitive motives at heart when purchasing T-Mobile? They don't even use the same mobile technology!
 
And you don't think Sprint wouldn't have anti-competitive motives at heart when purchasing T-Mobile? They don't even use the same mobile technology!

I don't think so. Sprint and T-Mobile are both far cheaper, and less restrictive in terms of data caps/texting, than AT&T and Verizon. It's obvious why AT&T wants to take one of their lower-priced competitors out of the market.
 
And you don't think Sprint wouldn't have anti-competitive motives at heart when purchasing T-Mobile? They don't even use the same mobile technology!

No. A Sprint purchase would have been pro-competitive. Sprint buying TMO would bring Sprint up to the same level as ATT & Verizon in customers and infrastructure. ATT buying TMO creates 2 huge carriers and leaves Sprint a distant third. Sprint would then be acquired by Verizon or ATT, leaving the US with only 2 carriers.
 
As a ATT customer this makes me so damn happy. ATT charges an outragous ammount right now could not of imagined how bad it would be if the merger goes though. Justice served as far as I am concerned. Just wish any other carrier had good coverage in my area.

The only benefit that I see T-Mobile and Sprint providing is an "anchor" of sorts to ensure AT&T and Verizon don't jack up their prices just because they can. Do take note that I listed both of the wireless behemoths in there.

EDIT:

No. A Sprint purchase would have been pro-competitive. Sprint buying TMO would bring Sprint up to the same level as ATT & Verizon in customers and infrastructure. ATT buying TMO creates 2 huge carriers and leaves Sprint a distant third. Sprint would then be acquired by Verizon or ATT, leaving the US with only 2 carriers.

How would a CDMA-based wireless carrier use T-Mobile's GSM technology? Aren't they on completely different wireless bands?
 
No. A Sprint purchase would have been pro-competitive. Sprint buying TMO would bring Sprint up to the same level as ATT & Verizon in customers and infrastructure. ATT buying TMO creates 2 huge carriers and leaves Sprint a distant third. Sprint would then be acquired by Verizon or ATT, leaving the US with only 2 carriers.

Hardly. A Sprint + TMo merger still leaves Sprint/TMo in a rather distant 3rd. They would still have little effect on AT&T and Verizon in terms of competition.
 
I don't think so. Sprint and T-Mobile are both far cheaper, and less restrictive in terms of data caps/texting, than AT&T and Verizon. It's obvious why AT&T wants to take one of their lower-priced competitors out of the market.

Yep. If AT&T is allowed to buy T-Mobile with such a flimsy excuse as "we need it to build out our 4g network" (especially with the leaked documents that show it'll take like 10% of the amount they're paying to buy T-Mo to ACTUALLY build out their network...), it opens the door for Verizon to make up some excuse to buy Sprint, and then we have a duopoly for wireless services, and EVERYBODY loses (except AT&T, Verizon and the Congressmen who are owned by the previously mentioned telecom companies).
 
The FCC also released a statement commenting:

By filing suit today, the Department of Justice has concluded that AT&T’s acquisition of T-Mobile would substantially lessen competition in violation of the antitrust laws. Competition is an essential component of the FCC’s statutory public interest analysis, and although our process is not complete, the record before this agency also raises serious concerns about the impact of the proposed transaction on competition. Vibrant competition in wireless services is vital to innovation, investment, economic growth and job creation, and to drive our global leadership in mobile. Competition fosters consumer benefits, including more choices, better service and lower prices.

It seems that the FCC isn't pleased about the merger either. They just lacked the balls to say anything about it until someone more important than them stood up. (Mostly because the FCC can't do shit about it)
 
Last edited:
Upon hearing news of this, Sprint will bump up the their ETF to $350. Yep that's right. That's a Lochness monster sized tree fiddy.

Stay classy Sprint.
 
Sprint trying to survive at 17% vs Att at 43% and verizon at 33% would have been impossible.

How exactly would it be impossible? It's not like AT&T is using their dominant position to undercut Sprint. I would say that Sprint's largest reliance is on their use of Verizon's (2G) network for roaming.
 
AT&T's BS response:

"We are surprised and disappointed by today's action, particularly since we have met repeatedly with the Department of Justice and there was no indication from the DOJ that this action was being contemplated. We plan to ask for an expedited hearing so the enormous benefits of this merger can be fully reviewed. The DOJ has the burden of proving alleged anti-competitive affects [sic] and we intend to vigorously contest this matter in court. At the end of the day, we believe facts will guide any final decision and the facts are clear. This merger will:

· Help solve our nation's spectrum exhaust situation and improve wireless service for millions.
· Allow AT&T to expand 4G LTE mobile broadband to another 55 million Americans, or 97% of the population;
· Result in billions of additional investment and tens of thousands of jobs, at a time when our nation needs them most.

We remain confident that this merger is in the best interest of consumers and our country, and the facts will prevail in court."
 
Back
Top