Breaking News - Clark is in the Race

[xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx]

Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3


JohnGalt, did you see ANY statements of political views in my post? How could you possibly know if "things don't go my way"? Your response indicates that you either didn't read my post in its entirety or ignored parts of it for which you have no answer. I asked you a question: Are you capable of posting without mentioning this drivel? I have yet to see a thread in which you've participated where you haven't posted this tripe.

You're off-topic, superstar. Oh, and please cite Peter 3:3 in yet another one of your posts....Are you capable of posting without mentioning this drivel? I have yet to see a thread in which you've participated where you haven't posted this tripe.

 

[xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx]

Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3



Your comments lead me to point to 2 Peter 3:3 (not for the first time in this forum, probably the 1,000th time) as evidence of the days in which we live.

*yawn* Tired.

 

[Vic]

meh... at this point, so early in the race, Clark is a distraction to keep Dean from peaking too early.

 

[Flyermax2k3]

Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx

Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3


JohnGalt, did you see ANY statements of political views in my post? How could you possibly know if "things don't go my way"? Your response indicates that you either didn't read my post in its entirety or ignored parts of it for which you have no answer. I asked you a question: Are you capable of posting without mentioning this drivel? I have yet to see a thread in which you've participated where you haven't posted this tripe.

You're off-topic, superstar. Oh, and please cite Peter 3:3 in yet another one of your posts....Are you capable of posting without mentioning this drivel? I have yet to see a thread in which you've participated where you haven't posted this tripe.

JohnGalt, do you see that quotation anywhere in this thread or any other current thread in this forum? My question is literal while yours is either the same (which would make it false as per the previous question in this post), or it is a parody of mine (which would only prove my earlier assertion that you resort to "personal attacks" whenever challenged with a question you cannot answer). So which is it JohnGalt? Are you a liar, or just insecure and unable to defend your own arguments without attacking those who oppose you?

 

[Pers]

Clark is the MAN

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Pers
Clark is the MAN

No, he is not.



CkG

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: Pers
Clark is the MAN

No, he is not.



CkG

Yeah, I think he is judging from the fear I see here. It would be a bitch if republicans had to pick their inferior candidate just to walk the party line. Clark seems to be the better man all around. Yep, if I was uncertain, you all have convinced me otherwise. Thanks CkG!

 

[phillyTIM]

Frankly, on the contingency that Clark doesn't really break through for some reason, he could team up with Howard Dean...that would be a definate dream team. Geographically, they have the northeast AND the South, and in their bullpen are someone fiscally responsible, and also someone militarily responsible.

That is certainly something Bush/Cheney, Bush/?, couldn't DREAM of bringing to the table. If anything, Bush's Presidency itself, his actions on record and holding him accountable, hurt his chances for reelection. He's been his own worst enemy.

 

[phillyTIM]

The Bush apologist are definately on the run now - their fear is obvious, as their responses strengthen and get more hard-lined.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: phillyTIM
The Bush apologist are definately on the run now - their fear is obvious, as their responses strengthen and get more hard-lined.

Buahahaha!!! Anything to the right of you is "hardline" in your mind

Winston & philly- I doubt many Republicans "fear" Clark. I certainly don't - Bush would easily trounce him head to head.

CkG

 

[phillyTIM]

You've been rather unusually punchy through this thread, CAD...something in your subconcious is obviously irritated.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: phillyTIM
You've been rather unusually punchy through this thread, CAD...something in your subconcious is obviously irritated.

Actually silly - I am quite amused at the prospect that the Dems needed a 10th dwarf. It shows they aren't unified(except in hating Bush) and they are searching for a "normal" person to run...too bad Clark isn't "normal" enought to unite the Democrats.

CkG

 

[phillyTIM]

That's your opinion. Time will tell, bud.

 

[Bulk Beef]

Before everybody starts jumping all over themselves to vote for Clark, does anyone know where he stands on actual issues?

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: phillyTIM
The Bush apologist are definately on the run now - their fear is obvious, as their responses strengthen and get more hard-lined.

Buahahaha!!! Anything to the right of you is "hardline" in your mind

Winston & philly- I doubt many Republicans "fear" Clark. I certainly don't - Bush would easily trounce him head to head.

CkG

Yeah, I want to see that debate