• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Breaking News...Bush in Iraq

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: sierrita
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: bctbct
edited to add link for palehorse, now theres a sick joke for comparison.
And the fact that you and 1EZduzit would relish in his death is outright disgusting and traitorous.


See now you are putting words in my mouth. I was pointing out that given your man has a great sense of humor its a pathetic for you to chastise people for their comments here.
I disagree with much of what GWB has done, and Clinton before him, but I would never celebrate the death of an American President. If you do not agree with 1EZduzit's disgusting remark, then I withdraw your name from the list of those here who deserve no respect.

With his single traitorous post, 1EZduzit just hit the top of that list. Hell, he may have even bumped Dave and Steeplerot down a notch! :|

bah...




Come on Ph, drop the traitor talk already.

Not liking George Bush doesn't mean someone is a traitoer; it means they are of the majority of humans on Planet Earth.

Honest to God you can be such a drama-queen sometimes.

:roll:
Wishing for, celebrating, or encouraging Bush's murder is traitorous.

Stop blindly supporting your moonbat brethren, or continue moving up the list yourself. Your choice.

I'm convinced that Bush's death is a commonly whispered dinner-party joke for some of you fanatical leftist freaks...
 
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Unlike many conservatives or neocons, liberals tend to be realists not given to self deception.
...except for the self deception that actually allows you to believe that.
 
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: sierrita
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: bctbct
edited to add link for palehorse, now theres a sick joke for comparison.
And the fact that you and 1EZduzit would relish in his death is outright disgusting and traitorous.


See now you are putting words in my mouth. I was pointing out that given your man has a great sense of humor its a pathetic for you to chastise people for their comments here.
I disagree with much of what GWB has done, and Clinton before him, but I would never celebrate the death of an American President. If you do not agree with 1EZduzit's disgusting remark, then I withdraw your name from the list of those here who deserve no respect.

With his single traitorous post, 1EZduzit just hit the top of that list. Hell, he may have even bumped Dave and Steeplerot down a notch! :|

bah...




Come on Ph, drop the traitor talk already.

Not liking George Bush doesn't mean someone is a traitoer; it means they are of the majority of humans on Planet Earth.

Honest to God you can be such a drama-queen sometimes.

:roll:
Wishing for, celebrating, or encouraging Bush's murder is traitorous.

Stop blindly supporting your moonbat brethren, or continue moving up the list yourself. Your choice.

I'm convinced that Bush's death is a commonly whispered dinner-party joke for some of you fanatical leftist freaks...

Drama-Queen!
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Lemon law
But unless events move fast, the so called Patraeus report will be positive spin for GWB and the status quo. The only remaining question is how much more time it buys.

Good news really irks you liberals, doesn't it?

The surge is working. Christ, even Billary admits that.

Won't PJ be excited that someone reads his posts and actually believes the bullshit contained within. Oddly enough, I expected more from you and am surprised you posted this.
 
Cliff notes from the upcoming speech.......

'Fear, terror, Al Quida, freedom. progress being made, we still have work to do'..........rinse and repeat

Yawn.
 
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Pabster
Good news really irks you liberals, doesn't it?
This is great news, Top Gun is in the Danger Zone!! Maybe we'll get lucky. LOL.
That's just f'n sick.:|


No, sick would be joking about not finding WMD at a "party" while US troops are dying. Your blind support for Bush is sickening to me.


sick joke

edited to add link for palehorse, now theres a sick joke for comparison.

Agreed. :thumbsup:
 
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Pabster
Good news really irks you liberals, doesn't it?
This is great news, Top Gun is in the Danger Zone!! Maybe we'll get lucky. LOL.
That's just f'n sick.:|


No, sick would be joking about not finding WMD at a "party" while US troops are dying. Your blind support for Bush is sickening to me.


sick joke

edited to add link for palehorse, now theres a sick joke for comparison.
And the fact that you and 1EZduzit would relish in his death is outright disgusting and traitorous.

I relish in his death? LMAO@U Where did I say that? I didn't, you just interpreted it that way because everybody who disagrees with you is guilty until proven innocent.

For all you know my meaning was that maybe we'd get lucky and Bush would be able to make some kind of a political deal with the Sunnis to support the Iraqi goverment? Why else would he be there? If you weren't such a tool ready to jump down the throat of any and everybody who disagrees you'd stop to realize that Bush being in the "danger zone" shows that (for the moment anyway) things must be in pretty good shape where he is, because Lord knows the chickenhawk wouldn't put himself any place truly dangerous.

I would think someone who claims to be an intelligence officer for the military would know a double entendre when he sees one?? 😛


 
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: bctbct
edited to add link for palehorse, now theres a sick joke for comparison.
And the fact that you and 1EZduzit would relish in his death is outright disgusting and traitorous.


See now you are putting words in my mouth. I was pointing out that given your man has a great sense of humor its a pathetic for you to chastise people for their comments here.
I disagree with much of what GWB has done, and Clinton before him, but I would never celebrate the death of an American President. If you do not agree with 1EZduzit's disgusting remark, then I withdraw your name from the list of those here who deserve no respect.

With his single traitorous post, 1EZduzit just hit the top of that list. Hell, he may have even bumped Dave and Steeplerot down a notch! :|

bah...

If Bush was dragged from the Whitehouse tommorrow do you think Americas reaction would be different from the day Saddam was relieved of duty? I think not.
I think that you're very very wrong. I'd give my life defending Bush, or any US President, from such an attack - I'd readily kill anyone trying to do him harm - and I'm not alone.


Theres one in every crowd, you do seem the drama queen today.
 
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: bctbct
edited to add link for palehorse, now theres a sick joke for comparison.
And the fact that you and 1EZduzit would relish in his death is outright disgusting and traitorous.


See now you are putting words in my mouth. I was pointing out that given your man has a great sense of humor its a pathetic for you to chastise people for their comments here.
I disagree with much of what GWB has done, and Clinton before him, but I would never celebrate the death of an American President. If you do not agree with 1EZduzit's disgusting remark, then I withdraw your name from the list of those here who deserve no respect.

With his single traitorous post, 1EZduzit just hit the top of that list. Hell, he may have even bumped Dave and Steeplerot down a notch! :|

bah...

If Bush was dragged from the Whitehouse tommorrow do you think Americas reaction would be different from the day Saddam was relieved of duty? I think not.

If that American was any type of smart (totally regardless of political affiliation), then yes they would have quite a different reaction.

 
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Pabster
Good news really irks you liberals, doesn't it?
This is great news, Top Gun is in the Danger Zone!! Maybe we'll get lucky. LOL.
That's just f'n sick.:|


No, sick would be joking about not finding WMD at a "party" while US troops are dying. Your blind support for Bush is sickening to me.


sick joke

edited to add link for palehorse, now theres a sick joke for comparison.
And the fact that you and 1EZduzit would relish in his death is outright disgusting and traitorous.

I relish in his death? LMAO@U Where did I say that? I didn't, you just interpreted it that way because everybody who disagrees with you is guilty until proven innocent.

For all you know my meaning was that maybe we'd get lucky and Bush would be able to make some kind of a political deal with the Sunnis to support the Iraqi goverment? Why else would he be there? If you weren't such a tool ready to jump down the throat of any and everybody who disagrees you'd stop to realize that Bush being in the "danger zone" shows that (for the moment anyway) things must be in pretty good shape where he is, because Lord knows the chickenhawk wouldn't put himself any place truly dangerous.

I would think someone who claims to be an intelligence officer for the military would know a double entendre when he sees one?? 😛
You're entirely FOS. You and I both know exactly what you meant - the only thing you meant.

It had nothing to do with simply disagreeing with him, or voicing dissent; and I think it was sick and traitorous. end-of-story.
 
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Not losing sleep if the president were to die today = traitorous? 😕

Traitorous to Bush & the GOP, maybe. But ph would call you a pussy. Would that upset you?

 
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Pabster
Good news really irks you liberals, doesn't it?
This is great news, Top Gun is in the Danger Zone!! Maybe we'll get lucky. LOL.
That's just f'n sick.:|


No, sick would be joking about not finding WMD at a "party" while US troops are dying. Your blind support for Bush is sickening to me.


sick joke

edited to add link for palehorse, now theres a sick joke for comparison.
And the fact that you and 1EZduzit would relish in his death is outright disgusting and traitorous.

I relish in his death? LMAO@U Where did I say that? I didn't, you just interpreted it that way because everybody who disagrees with you is guilty until proven innocent.

For all you know my meaning was that maybe we'd get lucky and Bush would be able to make some kind of a political deal with the Sunnis to support the Iraqi goverment? Why else would he be there? If you weren't such a tool ready to jump down the throat of any and everybody who disagrees you'd stop to realize that Bush being in the "danger zone" shows that (for the moment anyway) things must be in pretty good shape where he is, because Lord knows the chickenhawk wouldn't put himself any place truly dangerous.

I would think someone who claims to be an intelligence officer for the military would know a double entendre when he sees one?? 😛
You're entirely FOS. You and I both know exactly what you meant - the only thing you meant.

It had nothing to do with simply disagreeing with him, or voicing dissent; and I think it was sick and traitorous. end-of-story.
Nobody gives a shit what you think, end of story.

Man some of you ladies really get worked up over what is posted on a political forum that's of little consequence.:roll:
 
It seems that everyone has missed the obvious.

Bush is in Iraq so he can speak to Petraeus in private about what he wants in the upcoming report. No paper trail, no record of electronic communications, no snitches to be found later to show his direct influence on the report.
 
Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
It seems that everyone has missed the obvious.

Bush is in Iraq so he can speak to Petraeus in private about what he wants in the upcoming report. No paper trail, no record of electronic communications, no snitches to be found later to show his direct influence on the report.


Might be the "fall on the sword" talk
 
Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
It seems that everyone has missed the obvious.

Bush is in Iraq so he can speak to Petraeus in private about what he wants in the upcoming report. No paper trail, no record of electronic communications, no snitches to be found later to show his direct influence on the report.

...And the tin-foil hats have arrived! :laugh:
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: senseamp
Disgusting that this guy would use troops for political gain.

Mirror, meet reflection.

It's disgusting. He goes there to talk not to the troops but to the domestic audience here at home launching attacks at opponents of the war. This is same idiot who tells everyone else not to prejudge the report he is going to write for Petreaus.
 
I would certainly lose a lot of sleep and be a nervous wreck if GWB was assassinated. Because that would mean gasp Dick Cheney would be President. Bad as things are, its possible for things to get even worse. But we all have to face the fact that the President could die at any time and for any cause be it natural or due to violence. Since I won't change any of those death probabilities with my opinions, only subsequent postmortem events really are worth considering and opinions about the relative worth or lack thereof of a given President carry little weight.

And yes the assassinations of Lincoln, McKinley, and Kennedy radically changed history. Can any of us even say if they changed history for the better or the worse or say what our society would look like today if these events had not happened?
 
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
Originally posted by: nick1985
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong


Why are his "visits" to Iraq ALWAYS of the surprise variety?

Common sense tells me for security reasons.

He wants to live?
No kidding. Imagine all the hatred for him in Iraq, all those without mothers, fathers, sons and daughters because of him. I bet he's hated by as many Iraqis now as Sadam was when he was executed.
 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
Originally posted by: nick1985
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong


Why are his "visits" to Iraq ALWAYS of the surprise variety?

Common sense tells me for security reasons.

He wants to live?
No kidding. Imagine all the hatred for him in Iraq, all those without mothers, fathers, sons and daughters because of him. I bet he's hated by as many Iraqis now as Sadam was when he was executed.

He can't even fly to Baghdad anymore. Has to fly to Anbar..
 
Back
Top