IceBergSLiM
Lifer
- Jul 11, 2000
- 29,932
- 3
- 81
There should be a yearly assessment on BP of no less than 3 billion for the next 30 years. That would be a good starting point.
There should be a yearly assessment on BP of no less than 3 billion for the next 30 years. That would be a good starting point.
How would that affect all of the US BP station owners?
Also, how will you "assess" a largely foreign company?
Just countering the Bush posts. Turn about is still fair play, yes?
Pay up or the GOVT repo's all hard assets inside US territory and freezes all U.S. held accounts. Start there. I'm sure they'd prefer to pay up than give up their most prized market.
and I'm not sure I care about how that impacts BP station owners. BP posted the second largest profits by any company ever.
Idiocy is still idiocy.
Quite true.
I didn't see any rolleyes at the Bush posts, though...
I think that would only cement the "socialist" label onto Zer0...(huh? what does this have to do with socialism? )
What do BP's profits have to do with anything, anyway? They are largely from the increase in the price of crude oil. ( You asked a question how it would impact BP station owners and I said I don't care because they have no problem turning a profit and 3 billion a year will not impact them. So yes profitability is relevant when you are discussing ability to pay)
Sure they have to pay for the cleanup, etc...
You don't get a bigger fine for a mistake because you made more money this quarter...(I didn't say that anywhere.)
Sure you didn't....all the bush supports just stood there and agreed with the criticism.
What should he be doing during that time? I guess you think he should have been down there fixing the leak in a mini sub. Everyone know that if Obama wanted he would just go down there and stop the leak himself.![]()
bolded replies
You don't know what nationalization of private companies has to do with socialism?
Have you seen the photos of Obama and his good buddy Hugo embracing?![]()