Bouncing checks

dotcom173

Senior member
Jan 16, 2006
580
0
0
So, this is the second time my roommate bounced a check that he's given me for utilities or cable or something in our place. The first time, we both got charged a bounce fee, and i've always been under the impression that both sides get charged. However, he's arguing with me, saying that i shouldnt be charged a fee. While it doesnt make complete sense to me either, do both parties get charged for a bounced check?

I googled it.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,804
10,453
147
Yes, banks bend you over every way they can.

You must now bounce your roommate, preferably off of a concrete surface.
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
It's my understanding that you only get charged a fee if the chargeback from that bounced check results in your account being overdrawn.

Let's say you have $500 in your account and you deposit $100 from your roomy, which now brings your balance to $600. You then go spend $550 of it and his check bounces. Damn straight you will then get charged a fee. But, different banks have different policies on this. I actually had someone write me a bad check before but it did not overdraw my account. I was charged no fee.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,804
10,453
147
Originally posted by: KevinCU
I once bounced a check, and the vendor and I both were charged a fee.

You payed for dwarf sex with a check?
 

dotcom173

Senior member
Jan 16, 2006
580
0
0
I didnt withdraw the money of his which i deposited. I have a buffer of funds to prevent against that, so that wasnt the problem.

Banks just suck, thats all.
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
And, said roommate would be out of trust with me for that. I would not accept anything from him but money orders or cash from here on.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,804
10,453
147
Originally posted by: KevinCU
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: KevinCU
I once bounced a check, and the vendor and I both were charged a fee.

You payed for dwarf sex with a check?

I tried, but you never delivered.

And THAT'S why your sister doesn't work for me anymore.

She said you had cooties and a wee-wee that was hard to find w/o an electron microscope . . . and, face it, she should know! :laugh:
 

KevinCU

Senior member
Jan 14, 2009
896
0
0
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: KevinCU
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: KevinCU
I once bounced a check, and the vendor and I both were charged a fee.

You payed for dwarf sex with a check?

I tried, but you never delivered.

And THAT'S why your sister doesn't work for me anymore.

She said you had cooties and a wee-wee that was hard to find w/o an electron microscope . . . and, face it, she should know! :laugh:

I think you have my sister confused with yours. ;) Also I won't deny this tidbit.
 

Wonderful Pork

Golden Member
Jul 24, 2005
1,531
1
81
in my experience both parties get charged. In college, I had a paycheck bounce from a job at Quiznos (the owners took out every cent in their business account) losing $30 out of $100 sucked. But I learned my lesson. Never trust anybody when it comes to money.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,804
10,453
147
Originally posted by: KevinCU
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: KevinCU
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: KevinCU
I once bounced a check, and the vendor and I both were charged a fee.

You payed for dwarf sex with a check?

I tried, but you never delivered.

And THAT'S why your sister doesn't work for me anymore.

She said you had cooties and a wee-wee that was hard to find w/o an electron microscope . . . and, face it, she should know! :laugh:

I think you have my sister confused with yours. ;) Also I won't deny this tidbit.

LOL! :thumbsup:
 

zzuupp

Lifer
Jul 6, 2008
14,866
2,319
126
Consider yourself lucky that the check was not resubmitted so that you both couldn't get charged two ISF fees.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
65,992
14,396
146
It's normal for a bank to charge YOU for a refused deposit.

My wife was a Avon lady for years and got more than a couple of bounced checks. Everytime, the bank charged HER for the bounced check...which she then made the customer pay her for. PLUS the cost of the check.


The Kahleeforneeya law on bounced checks:

1. [ß 1] Claim for Statutory Penalty

Under California's Bad Check Law #1, a person who has written a check to another person or business can be required to pay the amount of the check and either a statutory service charge or a statutory penalty if the check is returned by the bank due to insufficient funds. The person who wrote the check is called the "drawer" and the person or business who accepted the check is called the "payee."

More particularly, the Bad Check Law states that the drawer must pay to the payee the following amounts:

(a) the face amount of the check, plus a statutory service charge; or, if the drawer does not pay this total in full, then--

(b) upon the payee's proper written demand for payment, the face amount of the check, plus a statutory service charge, plus the costs to mail the demand for payment; or, if the drawer does not pay this total in full within 30 days, then --

(c) if the payee has made a proper written demand for payment, and the drawer has not paid to the payee, within 30 days of the demand, the total at (b), then --

(i) the face amount of the check, plus

(ii) a statutory penalty of three times the face amount of the check, but not less than $100 nor more than $1,500. #2

Several limits apply: (a) The payee of the check cannot recover both a service charge and a statutory penalty. (b) The payee cannot recover either of these unless certain conditions described in this Legal Guide have been met. (c) Only one statutory penalty can be recovered with respect to the same check. (d) Interest cannot be claimed if either a service charge or a penalty is claimed. (e) Multiple recoveries for the same loss are not allowed. (See the detailed discussion of the statutory penalty in part B at ßß 3-32 below).

2. [ß 2]Claim for Service Charge

The payee of a check that has been returned for insufficient funds (see ß 5 below) can require the drawer to pay the payee the face amount of the check and a service charge of up to $25 for the first check and up to $35 for each subsequent check to that payee that is returned for insufficient funds. #3

However, the drawer of the check is not liable for a service charge in any of the following situations:

Bank error -- The drawer is not liable if the drawer presents the payee with written confirmation from the drawer's bank that the check was returned to the payee due to the bank's error. #4


Delay in automatic deposit -- The drawer is not liable if the drawer provides the payee with written evidence that the drawer's account had insufficient funds due to a delay in the regularly scheduled transfer or posting of a direct deposit of a social security or government benefit assistance payment. #5

Service charge already imposed -- The drawer is not liable if a service charge has already been charged with respect to that check.
The drawer also is not liable for a service charge if the payee has mailed the drawer a proper written demand for a statutory penalty under the Bad Check Law, and the drawer has failed to pay the amount of the check, the service charge and the mailing costs within 30 days after the mailing. Instead, the drawer is liable for the amount of the check (see ßß 41-43 below) and the statutory penalty (see ß 1 above).

One customer refused to pay the bank charges for a bounced check, so she filed with the D.A.'s department for writing bad checks.

They sent her one demand to pay the cost of the check PLUS $500 or be arrested for check fraud.
She called my wife and made arrangements to pay.


IMO, your roommate should have to pay any charges levied by your bank for his NSF check.

If he does it again, replace the roomie.
 

wiredspider

Diamond Member
Jun 3, 2001
5,239
0
0
Yea, it sucks like that. I don't get why I should get charged because someone else's check bounced, not like I could tell it would bounce, isn't it already bad enough I'm not getting the money from the check, but I also have to suffer a lost of $25-$35 on top of that? Bad check people suck..
 

Denithor

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2004
6,298
23
81
Originally posted by: Perknose
Yes, banks bend you over every way they can.

You must now bounce your roommate, preferably his head off of a concrete surface.

Fixed.
 

rgwalt

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2000
7,393
0
0
Originally posted by: dotcom173
I didnt withdraw the money of his which i deposited. I have a buffer of funds to prevent against that, so that wasnt the problem.

Banks just suck, thats all.

No, your roommate sucks.

He bounced one check on you, and you didn't demand cash after that point?

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.