Originally posted by: CRXican
shut up and let this stupid thread die
Lol.
😉
Originally posted by: jagec
When's the last time you went to buy a laptop, picked out the one with the specs you wanted, and had the guy tell you "This one comes in Alabaster Silver, Atomic Blue, Crystal Black, Green Tea, Rallye Red, or Redline Orange"?
Answer: You didn't, because color isn't one of the choices you get when you buy the vast majority of laptops on the market. Get a laptop skin if you have to.
I'm very picky about aesthetics, actually---I start with things that look good and then figure out which one works best out of the ones that look good. I don't care if someone gives me some amazing multi-million dollar laptop that can rival the CERN computers---if it's ugly, I don't want it.
😛
The laptop skin thing
is a good alternative, though. But again, it depends on the aesthetics in question.
Originally posted by: Tweak155
A laptop doesn't have a use through its color. It isn't a purse. It isn't a pair of shoes. It is a laptop. An expensive gift that has a functionality to a large degree - doesn't include color under that functionality.
First of all, many people choose things like cell phones, laptops, and even cars with the idea that they are "accessory" items. I think it's a bit ridiculous, but I don't want to argue the question "what is the purpose of fashion." I'm saying that if someone sees a laptop as an accessory item, it makes no sense to tell them, "No, you're WRONG, you CAN'T see it as an accessory item, shut up and take it as an item of function."
Originally posted by: Tweak155
If the receiver of said gift is "more concerned with form than function", then she doesn't need a laptop. Obviously said receiver WANTED a laptop. If said receiver just wanted it for "form", then I would have given said receiver a display model that cost 10 cents that was pink.
Well, what the receiver wanted was a PINK laptop. What the magnitude of that detail---"pink"---means to the receiver is
not up to the gift-giver to decide.
Giver thinks the detail is insignificant.
Receiver thinks the detail is crucial.
Who's right? Well, obviously that's a stupid question, because both of them are entitled to their own opinion. But my point is that it's invalid to say that one person's opinion is somehow more worthy than the other's. As far as I can tell, that's the whole reason that OP and the girl even got into a fight in the first place---he thinks her opinion is bunk, she thinks his opinion is bunk.
All
I am saying is that I, personally, like to give gifts that match the exact specifications that the receiver of the gift wants. I never assume that just because an item is missing this detail or that button that such an omission will pass muster. Some people like to be surprised and aren't as exacting, and that's fine. But as a gift-giver, you better know how exacting your gift-receiver is. If you know that they like exact gifts and then you get them something similar-but-not-quite, then you have absolutely no grounds on which to protest if they don't react well to the gift.