The full article here.
The gist is, Repubs plan will hit for $250 billion next year and $5.3 trillion over the decade while Dems plan will hit for $205 billion next year and $4.3 trillion over the decade.
Awesome times![]()
Sadly, it is pretty obvious to hard workers. I can't help but think that no matter if Democrats or Republicans are running the show, the top handful of people ALWAYS get the best deal. Could there be so many cross-interests at the top that they just 'take turns' in the lead and leave the fanatical followers make the party divide for them?Dems' efforts are nonetheless superior in terms of deficits, and offer the possibility of more tax increases in the future.
Taxes are sacrifice made for the common good, and if we want the middle class to willingly sacrifice, then the Rich must be shown to sacrifice as well to make the proposition politically feasible.
If Repubs, the party of the Rich, want to lead the way to fiscal responsibility, they'll have to lead by example, by making sacrifices themselves, sacrifices they can more easily afford than the rest of the population. When Mitt, Soros, Buffet & the Koch Bros pay more in taxes, it'll be easier to convince the rest of us that we need to do so ourselves.
Too obvious, huh?
Stop this both parties, crap.
Racial epithet removed.
It's his Government now.
-John
Sadly, it is pretty obvious to hard workers. I can't help but think that no matter if Democrats or Republicans are running the show, the top handful of people ALWAYS get the best deal. Could there be so many cross-interests at the top that they just 'take turns' in the lead and leave the fanatical followers make the party divide for them?