- Jun 15, 2001
- 34,438
- 1,619
- 126
https://www.theguardian.com/educati...-schools-world-map-mercator-peters-projection
So as a cartographer this annoys the crap out of me. True, there are much bigger problems right in our faces, but in this so called era of "fake news", this hits a little too close to home. Most of us were raised with maps in the Mercator projection. This means that straight horizontal and vertical lines correspond to lines along latitudes and longitudes respectively. Go straight right from New Orleans, for example, and you'll stay along 30°N. This has the problem of making things close to the poles, famously Greenland, look huge:
In reality Greenland is much smaller than Africa. The Peters projection makes things along the equator overly large:
To a person, every cartographer and GIS professional I know dislikes Mercator and *loathes* Peters. Peters (aka Gall-Peters) is an equal area projection, so areas are correct, though shapes are massively distorted. We have much better projections, such as the Winkel-Tripel:
BPS claims that the Peters maps will help students get a better grasp of the sizes of countries and continents, but there are much better ways to do this and I think most people can agree that the Peters maps just feel wrong. Somehow more wrong than Mercator. I like the Butterfly Projection, but I don't see it catching on:
Just say no to bad maps!
So as a cartographer this annoys the crap out of me. True, there are much bigger problems right in our faces, but in this so called era of "fake news", this hits a little too close to home. Most of us were raised with maps in the Mercator projection. This means that straight horizontal and vertical lines correspond to lines along latitudes and longitudes respectively. Go straight right from New Orleans, for example, and you'll stay along 30°N. This has the problem of making things close to the poles, famously Greenland, look huge:

In reality Greenland is much smaller than Africa. The Peters projection makes things along the equator overly large:

To a person, every cartographer and GIS professional I know dislikes Mercator and *loathes* Peters. Peters (aka Gall-Peters) is an equal area projection, so areas are correct, though shapes are massively distorted. We have much better projections, such as the Winkel-Tripel:

BPS claims that the Peters maps will help students get a better grasp of the sizes of countries and continents, but there are much better ways to do this and I think most people can agree that the Peters maps just feel wrong. Somehow more wrong than Mercator. I like the Butterfly Projection, but I don't see it catching on:

Just say no to bad maps!