Boss bro' in shootout with police *apparently cops shot him in back*

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ladies Man

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,775
0
76
Drop the gun/knife/whatever it may be means drop it... if you are to drunk, high, or just retarded you deserve to be shot.
 

VTboy

Banned
Oct 13, 2003
383
0
0
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: FallenHero
If he pointed it at the police, im not surprise he was shot.

He should be lucky he's alive.

If I were a cop and someone was strung out on drugs waving a gun around and not dropping it...I'm thinking headshot

headshot is the wrong answer my friend. In the real world you take body shots. The body is easier to hit than a head, and you are supposed to detain or subdue not kill outright.

Actually cops are taught to aim for the heart. So they are trained to kill not subdue.
 

Mookow

Lifer
Apr 24, 2001
10,162
0
0
Originally posted by: VTboy
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowskiheadshot is the wrong answer my friend. In the real world you take body shots. The body is easier to hit than a head, and you are supposed to detain or subdue not kill outright.

Actually cops are taught to aim for the heart. So they are trained to kill not subdue.

Not quite. Cops are taught to aim for center mass of the target presented. It isnt the same.
 

clamum

Lifer
Feb 13, 2003
26,256
406
126
Originally posted by: Dead Parrot Sketch

Just about every addict/drunk would say exactly the same thing at some point in their past; keep it up until your 30 and let us know how you and your friends are doing.

I don't really mean that you should. But someday you and your friends will discover you're just as mortal as every other human being.

Thankfully I'm not like "just about every addict/drunk." I don't care who you compare me to... I'm human but can use things responsibly because I know a lot about what I choose to partake in.

Originally posted by: PELarson

Why because I care more for the officer's psychological well being than I do that some F**K WIT took drugs and has ruined his life(luckily only his life) and caused his family and friends grief and agrivation.

People are never going to stop taking drugs, plain and simple. But they are illegal (unregulated) and then things like this happen. I guarantee it wasn't pure MDMA that made him do that.

 

tweakmm

Lifer
May 28, 2001
18,436
4
0
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
Originally posted by: Phocas
Jeebus, glad i never tried those kinds of things when i was younger.

Yeah, we were smarter than this dumb sh!t. Take drugs suffer the consequences. There is more to life than artificial highs.

I don't see this as a foreseeable consequence of taking ecstasy. I am constantly amazed by the holier-than-thou attitude of people here - you must have led some REALLY boring youths.

You must be a profoundly boring person if you have to take drugs to have a good time.
That isn't the point, and that isn't how it works.

There's nothing wrong with casual drug use. Alcohol, cigarettes, cocaine, I don't care(as long as it doesen't make you go nuts, like PCP). The problem is that many(most?) can't keep it under control.

Plus, PCP is some nasty sh!t. Something like that would never happen if it was just X.

LOL, show me a casual cocaine user. Casual cigarette smokers are around, but there aren't many. Point is that this stuff IS addicting. Whether it be physically addicting or psycologically addicting, it is addicting. My friend smokes cigs because he hung around people who did. When he started, it was just casually when he was around those friends. Now it's just an addiction. X is also very psycologically addicting. People get addicted to the feelings and the freedom. It happens a lot. And lacing X is not uncommon.
I know many casual coke users, and I've been known to blow a bit here and there now and again. I also know a few people who have let their coke problems spiral out of control, just like every other drug.
 

opticalmace

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2003
1,841
0
0
With reference to some of the posts on this thread, yes it is possible to have responsible drug use.
Not everyone is an insane addict.

However, many people do not know their limits and are often irrational. Or unsafe.
Or just plain inexperienced.

I can't speak for the harder drugs, though...I've never done coke and do not plan to.
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
Originally posted by: PanzerIV
Originally posted by: Phocas
Jeebus, glad i never tried those kinds of things when i was younger.

Yeah, we were smarter than this dumb sh!t. Take drugs suffer the consequences. There is more to life than artificial highs.

I don't see this as a foreseeable consequence of taking ecstasy. I am constantly amazed by the holier-than-thou attitude of people here - you must have led some REALLY boring youths.

You must be a profoundly boring person if you have to take drugs to have a good time.
That isn't the point, and that isn't how it works.

There's nothing wrong with casual drug use. Alcohol, cigarettes, cocaine, I don't care(as long as it doesen't make you go nuts, like PCP). The problem is that many(most?) can't keep it under control.

Plus, PCP is some nasty sh!t. Something like that would never happen if it was just X.

LOL, show me a casual cocaine user. Casual cigarette smokers are around, but there aren't many. Point is that this stuff IS addicting. Whether it be physically addicting or psycologically addicting, it is addicting. My friend smokes cigs because he hung around people who did. When he started, it was just casually when he was around those friends. Now it's just an addiction. X is also very psycologically addicting. People get addicted to the feelings and the freedom. It happens a lot. And lacing X is not uncommon.
Yeah. I know. And I agree.

I was just trying to shoot down his notion that you must be "incredibly boring" if you "need" to take drugs to have a "good time".
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
It may sound heartless, but at least the person who took the risk here suffered most of the consequences. I say most because I'm sure the officer who took the shot is anguishing over the results.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: opticalmace
With reference to some of the posts on this thread, yes it is possible to have responsible drug use.
Not everyone is an insane addict.

However, many people do not know their limits and are often irrational. Or unsafe.
Or just plain inexperienced.

I can't speak for the harder drugs, though...I've never done coke and do not plan to.

There is a big difference from Mary Jane to PCP and X
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: rh71

Wow I don't know how you can get around the fact that you are suggesting that by taking drugs (or any known risky behavior), our youths would've been more exciting. What do you know about anyone's youths ?

Okay, I'll bite on this. I never at any time advocated drug use, but I respectfully think risk-taking is part of growing up, and that an absence of it does indeed make one's youth more boring. I have seen terribly judgmental attitudes here time and again, and this is just one example. People are taking the attitude that, by taking ecstasy, this guy should reasonably have predicted something awful would happen, and I just see that as silly. In my experience, the people who are that harshly judgmental tend to have led sheltered lives. I am not pro-drugs in any form or fashion.

 

rubix

Golden Member
Oct 16, 1999
1,302
2
0
if you do or tried drugs, i hate you. if you never tried drugs, i still probably hate you.
 

ReiAyanami

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2002
4,466
0
0
imagine if this stuff was legalized


suicide bombers often use illicit drugs, it makes them feel invincible right before they go collect their 72 raisins

40-50 years ago rebels in SE asia would coke up and rush our soldiers and try to ambush them with machetes, they didn't have guns they just ran straight up with a machete. even though they were filled with a dozen 9mm's they kept coming because the coke and such made them invincible. that's why we switched over to colt .45's. one shot and knocked them down and out coke or no coke.

your boss's brother should: A) not have done drugs
B) not own a gun
C) both

hope he doesn't sue the police, cuz its cases like these that cause TASR's stock to shoot up 4000%.
 

JoeKing

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,641
1
81
Many of our soldiers and pilots take a form of speed for extremly long missions.

just adding fuel to the fire.
 

GonzoCircus

Senior member
Jan 31, 2004
665
0
0
There is such a thing as responsible recreational drug use. This obviously does not fit into that category. Taking a large amount of hallucinagenic drugs, especially when you dont know what exactly what is in them, and having access to a firearm is never a good idea.
 

MAME

Banned
Sep 19, 2003
9,281
1
0
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
http://www.katc.com/

Scroll down to "19 year old college student shot by Lafayette police officers"

From what my boss' wife is telling me, (my boss is still in LA - this story is different from the video) apparently he had taken 2 hits of X. He had gone home and started hullicinating - he thought he saw 3 guys raping a woman in front of his house. Then after they were done the 3 guys came into the house. Then he started shooting at the "attackers" and firing randomly. He then called the police.

Police came, he was still tripping. My boss' wife said he never fired upon police but was waving the gun around. There was a standoff. Then she said at 8 in the morning SWAT came in and shot him. She claims he never shot at them (unlike the video) - she said the Sheriff among other witnesses said there was no shots fired by him when they stormed the house. (That is in dispute of course)

Right now he's paralyzed from the waist down but in good spirits overall. Out on $1.2 million bond.

This is just nuts...my boss' wife's sister said the X probably was tainted with PCP or something along those lines in order for him to trip out so bad. I'm still kind of in shock at the whole thing.

Good, he got what he deserved. Hopefully he'll learn.
 

clamum

Lifer
Feb 13, 2003
26,256
406
126
Originally posted by: ReiAyanami
imagine if this stuff was legalized


suicide bombers often use illicit drugs, it makes them feel invincible right before they go collect their 72 raisins

40-50 years ago rebels in SE asia would coke up and rush our soldiers and try to ambush them with machetes, they didn't have guns they just ran straight up with a machete. even though they were filled with a dozen 9mm's they kept coming because the coke and such made them invincible. that's why we switched over to colt .45's. one shot and knocked them down and out coke or no coke.

your boss's brother should: A) not have done drugs
B) not own a gun
C) both

hope he doesn't sue the police, cuz its cases like these that cause TASR's stock to shoot up 4000%.

So what you're saying is if drugs were legalized, people would get all hopped up on crack-cocaine and rush the police with machettes or guns or something because they were invincible?
 

tweakmm

Lifer
May 28, 2001
18,436
4
0
Originally posted by: clamum
Originally posted by: ReiAyanami
imagine if this stuff was legalized


suicide bombers often use illicit drugs, it makes them feel invincible right before they go collect their 72 raisins

40-50 years ago rebels in SE asia would coke up and rush our soldiers and try to ambush them with machetes, they didn't have guns they just ran straight up with a machete. even though they were filled with a dozen 9mm's they kept coming because the coke and such made them invincible. that's why we switched over to colt .45's. one shot and knocked them down and out coke or no coke.

your boss's brother should: A) not have done drugs
B) not own a gun
C) both

hope he doesn't sue the police, cuz its cases like these that cause TASR's stock to shoot up 4000%.

So what you're saying is if drugs were legalized, people would get all hopped up on crack-cocaine and rush the police with machettes or guns or something because they were invincible?
That's what I got too, I dunno, it sounds pretty logical to me...
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
I don't care what he was using or what it was laced with or anything like that. I want to know why it matters if he fired at the police or not. Why should they have to wait until it's too late? Why can't they protect themselves when their lives are in danger? The family of some low-life drug dealer is suing a town near me for $1 BILLION because the SWAT team killed the drug dealer in a raid because he had a gun. Un-freaking-believable.

2000 posts.
 

tweakmm

Lifer
May 28, 2001
18,436
4
0
Originally posted by: Mill
Don_Vito, Ecstasy is closely related to methamphetamine.
No one on MDMA is going to be picking up a gun and shooting it unless they think it is filled with magical bullets of love :D

 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
60 min.did a segment on X a few years ago that documented brain damage in first time users...
 

clamum

Lifer
Feb 13, 2003
26,256
406
126
Originally posted by: IGBT
60 min.did a segment on X a few years ago that documented brain damage in first time users...

Bahahahaha 60 Minutes...

Anyways. Brain damage in first time users hey? What was the dosage?
 

Mookow

Lifer
Apr 24, 2001
10,162
0
0
Originally posted by: ReiAyanami
imagine if this stuff was legalized

suicide bombers often use illicit drugs, it makes them feel invincible right before they go collect their 72 raisins

40-50 years ago rebels in SE asia would coke up and rush our soldiers and try to ambush them with machetes, they didn't have guns they just ran straight up with a machete. even though they were filled with a dozen 9mm's they kept coming because the coke and such made them invincible. that's why we switched over to colt .45's. one shot and knocked them down and out coke or no coke.

your boss's brother should: A) not have done drugs
B) not own a gun
C) both

hope he doesn't sue the police, cuz its cases like these that cause TASR's stock to shoot up 4000%.

The incidents you are referring to occurred roughly around the start of the 20th century, it involved (pricipally) Moro tribesmen of the Philippines engaging US servicemen, and we switched from the 38 revolver to the Colt 1911 firing 45 ACP rounds. The usual drug used was opium, IIRC. Oh, and they pre-wrapped themselves to form a rough full body tourniquet, made them last a little longer. But you got the general idea.

And technically, if this was legalized, since he probably wasnt looking to mix drugs, he wouldnt have gotten any PCP with his X, and he would have been fine.