Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: Tab
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
When's the last time you heard of any Bush-backed attempt to "ban" same-sex marriage?
I'll tell you when - last year, election time. Bush and his admin couldn't care less about same-sex marriage or the ban thereof, but because enough of the voting public did at the time, he took a stance on it and pushed it to the front-burner.
And what does that make him? A pandering politician, just like the rest of them, nothing more.
I guess I could agree with that, but that doesn't mean that before that Bush was gay for gay marriage? I highly doubt it...
Tell me, who's supporting the fundies who beileve that homosexsuals are destroying the sancity of marriage?
George Bush, at least he was...
He supports the "fundies" because they support him. If Bush had suddenly decided to support "free-thinking, liberal ideas that champion diversity," do you think that all the "liberal" voters would have suddenly decided to vote for him over Kerry? Of course not. Once you start down a political path, you pretty much have to continue down it to maintain your supporters. Changing will only lose you votes; rarely will you gain any.
So yeah, Bush may not personally be for same-sex marriage, but I'd guarantee you that he's not against as much as he played up to it during election time. Like Darkhawk mentioned, it's just a wedge issue that he jumped on for maximum support.