Bolsonaro declares Brazil's 'liberation from socialism' as he is sworn in

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,046
33,093
136
In other positive news Lula winning probably means that Brazil will agree to sell Ukraine EMB 314 Super Tucancos. Ukraine tried to buy some before the war but Bolsonaro scuttled the deal because he's tight with Putin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roger Wilco

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,446
7,508
136
Probably a large number of jobs and a lot of money to be made in destroying the entire Amazon rain forest.
It looks like a very even divide where no small number support Bolsonaro.
Throw in the economic question and saving the Amazon may not be politically viable. Lot of money to grease the wheels for its destruction, or the destruction of anyone standing in the way.
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,027
2,595
136
Probably a large number of jobs and a lot of money to be made in destroying the entire Amazon rain forest.
It looks like a very even divide where no small number support Bolsonaro.
Throw in the economic question and saving the Amazon may not be politically viable. Lot of money to grease the wheels for its destruction, or the destruction of anyone standing in the way.
I remember reading somewhere that it would be economically viable for the rest of the civilized world to simply pay Brazil not to destroy the rainforest annually. Basically the economic value Brazil gets from the rainforest destructive activities they participate in (for example ranching and the cattle industry), is far less than the value most western countries put on the rainforest in terms of climate regulation in terms of actual dollars. The rest of the world could simply pool some money together and say "hey we will pay you Brazil to leave the rain forest alone" with a sum of money that would grossly exceed whatever gdp Brazil would get from whatever they were going to do with the rainforest and it would still be mere pittance for the rest of the world. I think the number was around 9 billion usd annually is what brazil derives from it's rainforest destructive activities and for western nations that's pittance or even a rounding error particularly if you're talking pooling money across countries.
 
Last edited:

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,594
29,224
146
I remember reading somewhere that it would be economically viable for the rest of the civilized world to simply pay Brazil not to destroy the rainforest annually. Basically the economic value Brazil gets from the rainforest destructive activities they participate in (for example ranching and the cattle industry), is far less than the value most western countries put on the rainforest in terms of climate regulation in terms of actual dollars. The rest of the world could simply pool some money together and say "hey we will pay you Brazil to leave the rain forest alone" with a sum of money that would grossly exceed whatever gdp Brazil would get from whatever they were going to do with the rainforest and it would still be mere pittance for the rest of the world. I think the number was around 9 billion usd annually is what brazil derives from it's rainforest destructive activities and for western nations that's pittance or even a rounding error particularly if you're talking pooling money across countries.

When you think about it like that, Musk could have bought ~6 years of rainforest, but instead he bought a failing texting app.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
31,577
9,958
136
I remember reading somewhere that it would be economically viable for the rest of the civilized world to simply pay Brazil not to destroy the rainforest annually. Basically the economic value Brazil gets from the rainforest destructive activities they participate in (for example ranching and the cattle industry), is far less than the value most western countries put on the rainforest in terms of climate regulation in terms of actual dollars. The rest of the world could simply pool some money together and say "hey we will pay you Brazil to leave the rain forest alone" with a sum of money that would grossly exceed whatever gdp Brazil would get from whatever they were going to do with the rainforest and it would still be mere pittance for the rest of the world. I think the number was around 9 billion usd annually is what brazil derives from it's rainforest destructive activities and for western nations that's pittance or even a rounding error particularly if you're talking pooling money across countries.
for something that's critical to the health of the planet, we really SHOULD be doing that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zinfamous

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
20,380
5,126
136
I remember reading somewhere that it would be economically viable for the rest of the civilized world to simply pay Brazil not to destroy the rainforest annually. Basically the economic value Brazil gets from the rainforest destructive activities they participate in (for example ranching and the cattle industry), is far less than the value most western countries put on the rainforest in terms of climate regulation in terms of actual dollars. The rest of the world could simply pool some money together and say "hey we will pay you Brazil to leave the rain forest alone" with a sum of money that would grossly exceed whatever gdp Brazil would get from whatever they were going to do with the rainforest and it would still be mere pittance for the rest of the world. I think the number was around 9 billion usd annually is what brazil derives from it's rainforest destructive activities and for western nations that's pittance or even a rounding error particularly if you're talking pooling money across countries.
Perhaps even buy the rain forest outright then actively defend it.