• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Boise State...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Aren't most schedules actually created years in advanced? Teams like TN play Kentucky, Vanderbilt, Florida and Kentucky the same weekends every year. I know that they sign contracts with other teams to play from "2010-2012". So most of the big names schooles actually have a number of teams already locked up years in advanced. That with the fact that you have to play a certain number of in-conference games. How many changes do teams have to really schedule Boise State and would think they would be good years in advance?
 
Last edited:
Playoff would be best but Fan travel and game attendance would be way way down.

Theres a reason all the bowls are played in the dead of winter in southern sunny states. Fans travel. With a playoff system - fans just are not going to travel to the first 2 games and it will hurt the economy of those cities where the original bowls were played.

Then you add in the fact teams generally get at least 3-weeks to prep for their opponent and more games means more injuries.
 
Boise vs Oregon's schedule is just laughable. Why doesn't Boise just join a real BCS conference and end the speculation, hell TCU is joining the Big East to add some cred.
 
i was hoping there woul dbe about 8 decent undefeated teams at the end of the year just to royally screw the bcs system...yesterday unfortunately blew that plan up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top