Rattledagger
Elite Member
- Feb 5, 2001
- 2,994
- 19
- 81
Finding any computer running the cpu-version of Collatz is difficult, but did manage locating two Xeon-systems, one X7550, 2 GHz 32-way, and another X5570, 2.93 GHz 16-way, there the 2 GHz uses roughly 24 hours while faster one just under 15 hours per wu. Meaning the Ati-4850 is roughly 50x faster than a 2.93 GHz and roughly 85x faster than the 2 GHz...On an ATI 4850, Collatz tasks have been finishing in 1,000 - 1,100 seconds with a few outliers. In round numbers, let's say that's 17 minutes. There are no CPU tasks left in my history. IIRC, those took many hours.
I'm not the only one who has been running this & hasn't checked in on this thread. Hopefully, the rest will continue to running Collatz as well.
Taking into account #cpu's, the Ati-4850 still beats the 32-way system 2.7x in daily production, and the 16-way system 3.2x in daily production.
The cuda-cards is apparently slower, but still the gpu's has an advantage.
