Hi all.
Some clarity please. This is what I did:
Gigabyte mobo with 939 3500+ processor
BOINC benchmarks (OC @ 2.64 up from 2.2 - 20%):
- 4200 Floating
- 13900 Integer
Bought a Foxconn mobo and a 939 X2 4800+
Put the X2 in the Gigabyte mobo (damn good mobo and in main machine) and the 3500+ in the Foxconn (to fit in the crack-rack)
X2 benchmarks (OC @ 2.63 up from 2.4 - 9.5%):
- 4400 Floating
- 14400 Integer
This is per CPU and exactly what I would have expected. I was always confused as to what I would get becasue of the 4800+ rating. This is actually closer to 7000+ (2 x 3500+) becasue both cores are used fully.
3500+ benchmarks (OC @ 2.57 up from 2.2 - 17%):
- 3150 Floating (!!!!)
- 13600 Integer.
So here is the query. Why have the Floating values dropped so much on the 3500+? There are only 2 main differences. One is the mobo, and the second is the fact I used 512 meg of the 2 x 512 in the Foxconn mobo. Need to upgrade the memory in the X2 now (got the other 512 meg), but that is going to be expensive.
Some clarity please. This is what I did:
Gigabyte mobo with 939 3500+ processor
BOINC benchmarks (OC @ 2.64 up from 2.2 - 20%):
- 4200 Floating
- 13900 Integer
Bought a Foxconn mobo and a 939 X2 4800+
Put the X2 in the Gigabyte mobo (damn good mobo and in main machine) and the 3500+ in the Foxconn (to fit in the crack-rack)
X2 benchmarks (OC @ 2.63 up from 2.4 - 9.5%):
- 4400 Floating
- 14400 Integer
This is per CPU and exactly what I would have expected. I was always confused as to what I would get becasue of the 4800+ rating. This is actually closer to 7000+ (2 x 3500+) becasue both cores are used fully.
3500+ benchmarks (OC @ 2.57 up from 2.2 - 17%):
- 3150 Floating (!!!!)
- 13600 Integer.
So here is the query. Why have the Floating values dropped so much on the 3500+? There are only 2 main differences. One is the mobo, and the second is the fact I used 512 meg of the 2 x 512 in the Foxconn mobo. Need to upgrade the memory in the X2 now (got the other 512 meg), but that is going to be expensive.