Boehner Plans To File Suit Against Obama

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...nst-obama-over-alleged-abuse-executive-power/

The speaker alleged that the president not only has ignored the law but "brags about it," decrying what he described as "arrogance and incompetence."

"My view is the president has not faithfully executed the laws," he said. "What we have seen clearly over the last five years is an effort to erode the power of the Legislative Branch."

Well,.. that escalated quickly.

Once the lawsuit is ruled in Boehner's America's favor, do you think it will be the 1st step to impeach and deport Obama??
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,726
54,731
136
I liked when he was asked what he was going to sue about he was like "uhmm, I'll get back to you on that".
 

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,587
126
Can the American people sue Boehner for how much money he's wasted with his partisan bullshit and force him to repay the country the millions he's cost us?
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
How about killing US citizens without due process.

Boehner WILL vindicate those US citizens who were out in the field of battle targeting, planning and orchestrating the murder of American soldiers.

Don't you worry - US citizens murdering our American solders will be allowed to further spend our tax money to possibly be allowed to avoid the death penalty for killing our own armed forces.

Heck, lets hope they then get a book deal - or, even better yet, set free to murder more soldiers!! I am pretty sure you would never have a problem with that last part.
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
198
106
A good thing to sue over! The only problem is that lots of Republicans support doing that.

When the government is corrupt and refuses to uphold the law, what are people supposed to do? Re-electing those same idiots into office year after year is not the answer.

Are people just not paying attention? Do they vote for the same party over and over because that is what their parents did?

The time has pasted for a third or forth party to come into play. But people refuse to vote third party.

I just do not understand why people vote the way they do.

People want term limits, but vote the same people into office. If you want term limits, vote them out of office.

I worry about what the government will be like in 20 or even 50 years.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,726
54,731
136
When the government is corrupt and refuses to uphold the law, what are people supposed to do? Re-electing those same idiots into office year after year is not the answer.

Are people just not paying attention? Do they vote for the same party over and over because that is what their parents did?

The time has pasted for a third or forth party to come into play. But people refuse to vote third party.

I just do not understand why people vote the way they do.

People want term limits, but vote the same people into office. If you want term limits, vote them out of office.

I worry about what the government will be like in 20 or even 50 years.

People vote the way they do because of Duverger's Law. (although it's more of a trend than a law)

Any system where 51% of the vote gives you 100% of the representation will gravitate towards a two party system. Don't like it? Blame the Constitution.
 

TheSiege

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2004
3,918
14
81
When the government is corrupt and refuses to uphold the law, what are people supposed to do? Re-electing those same idiots into office year after year is not the answer.

Are people just not paying attention? Do they vote for the same party over and over because that is what their parents did?

The time has pasted for a third or forth party to come into play. But people refuse to vote third party.

I just do not understand why people vote the way they do.

People want term limits, but vote the same people into office. If you want term limits, vote them out of office.

I worry about what the government will be like in 20 or even 50 years.

Like Charlie Rangel? Or Thad Cochran?
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,570
6,712
126
A good thing to sue over! The only problem is that lots of Republicans support doing that.

So do I and a lot of other Democrats. But I'm all for any attempt to hold the President accountable because in this case those Democrats and Republicans who agree with me are in sufficient numbers to prevent a guilty verdict. The President of all the people will never allow an abstraction like fidelity to the Constitution lead to the absurdity that one citizen who plans and works to kill as many fellow citizens continue to live to accomplish that. In cases where the law can't reach and apply, extra-judicial means must be applied if possible.

For everything that should be absolute, like a citizens right to life, there are other absolutes that can at some point take precedence.
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
When the government is corrupt and refuses to uphold the law, what are people supposed to do? Re-electing those same idiots into office year after year is not the answer.

Are people just not paying attention? Do they vote for the same party over and over because that is what their parents did?

The time has pasted for a third or forth party to come into play. But people refuse to vote third party.

I just do not understand why people vote the way they do.

People want term limits, but vote the same people into office. If you want term limits, vote them out of office.

I worry about what the government will be like in 20 or even 50 years.
So you think that - given limited resources for various federal departments - the Obama Administrations shouldn't have discretion to have these departments focus on the laws they think are most important? Everything should be slavishly on auto-pilot, regardless of how counter-productive?

So, for example, the Obama Justice Department should be required to aggressively enforce federal Marijuana laws in states that have passed medical marijuana laws or laws the decriminalize or legalize marijuana, even though almost everyone agrees enforcing such laws is almost a complete waste of resources? And the Obama USCIS should not be allowed to decide which immigration laws make the most sense to enforce?

Edit: It's quite amusing that in a world of shrinking budgets, "smaller government" is the goal of right-wingers, except when the reality of smaller government is that a smaller government is forced to pick and choose which laws it will aggressively enforce.
 
Last edited:

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,755
12,063
136
Its because he is a Black president. notice no white president has ever been sued for executive actions.

I should have said above As GWB would say after signing one of his many signing statements where he picked what parts of the law he would enforce, "bring it on".
 

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
You mean the program begun under Bush - with no hint of a lawsuit from outraged Republicans - and continued by Obama?

Yep this right here ^^

We were purposefully given false information and lied into a war, and yet no one asking for Bush's head or Cheney.
 

D-Man

Platinum Member
Oct 18, 1999
2,991
0
71
Boehner WILL vindicate those US citizens who were out in the field of battle targeting, planning and orchestrating the murder of American soldiers.

Don't you worry - US citizens murdering our American solders will be allowed to further spend our tax money to possibly be allowed to avoid the death penalty for killing our own armed forces.

Heck, lets hope they then get a book deal - or, even better yet, set free to murder more soldiers!! I am pretty sure you would never have a problem with that last part.

Didn't Obama just free 5 guys from Gitmo that in your words [Heck, lets hope they then get a book deal - or, even better yet, set free to murder more soldiers!!]
 

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
Its because he is a Black president. notice no white president has ever been sued for executive actions.

Put the race card down and step away.
:whiste:
notable lawsuits involving U.S. presidents:

  1. Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) -- An Air Force analyst fired by President Richard Nixon sued the former president for damages, after a government commission determined his firing was unjust. The 5-4 Supreme Court decision held the President is entitled to absolute immunity from damage suits based on official presidential acts.
 

CountZero

Golden Member
Jul 10, 2001
1,796
36
86
It is a refreshing change of pace to see the house do something, anything really, as opposed to the absolute nothing they've been doing for six years.

A suit as opposed to seeking impeachment seems spineless though and smacks of playing politics in an election year. I guess with the ideal of bipartisan compromises essentially dead these guys really have nothing better to do with their time.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
Its because he is a Black president. notice no white president has ever been sued for executive actions.

Wow, the race card. Nice move. I am surprised that after all these years that obama has been in office that no ones has thought to use the race card.