Bobcat performance/power vs current AMD

[richough3]

I know Bobcat is expected to perform better than the Atom but have a worse battery life, but how will it compare to AMDs current mobile offerings such as the Neo II K125?

 

[Soleron]

I know Bobcat is expected to perform better than the Atom but have a worse battery life, but how will it compare to AMDs current mobile offerings such as the Neo II K125?

Bobcat will perform like "90% of today's mainstream performance". Dirk Meyer clarified that by saying "that means fullsize laptops".

So that means it'll be 90% of a ~2.5GHz Athlon II (given AMD's mobile chips go up to 3.1GHz dual-cores).

Power consumption will be comparable to today's netbooks, because Atom's chipset consumes more power than Atom.

Graphics performance will be comparable to a 5450 / Sandy Bridge.

 

[perdomot]

Are there any numbers for Bulldozer? Curious how it compares to Intel's Sandy.

 

[busydude]

Are there any numbers for Bulldozer? Curious how it compares to Intel's Sandy.

I guess we have to wait a few more months before AMD starts sampling BD.