• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bobcat performance/power vs current AMD

R

richough3

Member
I know Bobcat is expected to perform better than the Atom but have a worse battery life, but how will it compare to AMDs current mobile offerings such as the Neo II K125?
 
richough3 said:
I know Bobcat is expected to perform better than the Atom but have a worse battery life, but how will it compare to AMDs current mobile offerings such as the Neo II K125?
Click to expand...

Bobcat will perform like "90% of today's mainstream performance". Dirk Meyer clarified that by saying "that means fullsize laptops".

So that means it'll be 90% of a ~2.5GHz Athlon II (given AMD's mobile chips go up to 3.1GHz dual-cores).

Power consumption will be comparable to today's netbooks, because Atom's chipset consumes more power than Atom.

Graphics performance will be comparable to a 5450 / Sandy Bridge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top