spacejamz
Lifer
- Mar 31, 2003
- 10,960
- 1,656
- 126
Key word: "kinda"
My friend, YOU are the one "splitting technical hairs."
Sony had a huge stake in the Blu-Ray format because Sony has a HUGE stake in the BDA.
BD has been as successful as I ever expected a DVD successor to be. I don't hold that success against Sony. BD is still as much "Sony's format" as it ever was. Sure, major CE entities have to join the alliance, that's the reason it exists. Sony is making royalties from patents they owned before the BDA was created.
All the people mocking Sony's failed formats conveniently omit the successful ones...
Sony was one of 4 companies that created the original DVD format. Successful beyond what anyone could have imagined with market saturation far beyond what VHS was ever able to reach. What about Playstation? It was wildly successful. S/PDIF is still used today to carry much newer codecs to your surround sound equipment. Even minidisc was somewhat successful in Japan (and that's closely tied with S/PDIF).
Google "who owns blu ray" and click on the results that pop up...the first page of replies pretty much all say that Sony does not "own" blu ray which is the point I am trying to make.
I followed the format war closely from day 1. I followed the threads here and on AVS forums. I bought a 60GB Playstation 3 on launch day and know that Sony was heavily vested in blu ray and was relieved when Warner Brothers pulled the plug on HD DVD. I got two HD DVD players for $90 each when the fire sale happened.