BLM: Falcon Heights police fatally shot man

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
So, in this case, can gun advocates tell me how owning a gun protect you?

In this case, owning a gun didn't protect him, nor did anyone ever claim that owning a gun is a miracle fix that will protect you in every scenario. That's just strawman BS.
 

Subyman

Moderator <br> VC&G Forum
Mar 18, 2005
7,876
32
86
What is there to "be over"? Being a CCW holder doesn't imbibe you with super powers such as the ability to never be involved in a police shooting incident whether justified or not and it shouldn't change the punishment the officer will receive if the later.

That's what gun rights advocates should be making sure of. If this guy was legally carrying as the article says and the cop gunned him down, then gun guys should be rabid.
 

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,395
277
136
Is it too much to ask for people to wait until all facts are out, regardless if you're white, black, brown, or yellow?
 

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,395
277
136
I wonder if we, as a nation, could push for just one day of cops not having guns. Let the cops actually have to interact with people as human beings while doing their job for just one day. Their itchy trigger fingers are getting way too itchy as of late.



Go look at statistics of police violence, and it's statistically shocking. Shocking as in it happens much less than the media likes to admit.

Can we have a daily mourning on Monday for all the people who die in Chicago each weekend? That's the true outrage, but it doesn't play to people's emotions.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
That's what gun rights advocates should be making sure of. If this guy was legally carrying as the article says and the cop gunned him down, then gun guys should be rabid.

If the facts are as they appear to be, then yes, they should be rabid and they are. The guy apparently was smart and even told the officer that he had a concealed weapon. Often things go south when the officer doesn't know and then all of a sudden sees a glimpse of a weapon or something... but that's not what happened here. Seems like the victim did everything by the book, but still ended up dead because of the mixup and a panicked cop.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,245
136
In this case, owning a gun didn't protect him, nor did anyone ever claim that owning a gun is a miracle fix that will protect you in every scenario. That's just strawman BS.

Correction, owning a gun didn't merely fail to protect him; it actually got him killed. That said, a single incident doesn't prove much of anything about...anything.
 

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126
Correction, owning a gun didn't merely fail to protect him; it actually got him killed. That said, a single incident doesn't prove much of anything about...anything.

Wasn't telling the cop that he had a concealed carry the fatal mistake?... or perhaps going for his driver's license. What he should have done was put his hands up. He then should have asked permission to reach for his driver's license. He should have then judged the cop's reaction. If the cop was acting dicey, he should have asked to step out of the car so the cop could reach for the wallet and take it out. At no point should he have put his hands down without the cops ok. This wouldn't have guaranteed his safety but it would have upped his chances.

I guess it is out of the realm of possibility to hire officers who aren't chicken shit clowns.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
brutal pic on the Daily News


this is a pretty horrific image, and I will take it down if needed. However I think the image tells alot about the shooting. Oh and SheHateMe, ignore buckshot, he's not worth a minute of your time. A strawman builder of extraordinary skills.

That really should have a big warning or be a link or something.
 

Exophase

Diamond Member
Apr 19, 2012
4,439
9
81
Correction, owning a gun didn't merely fail to protect him; it actually got him killed. That said, a single incident doesn't prove much of anything about...anything.

It doesn't take a lot of imagination to see how just carrying a gun could escalate some situations where the other party also has a gun. How much that balances against other cases where it deescalates situations or has other positive benefits is really hard to even figure out how to study, let alone actually study.

But you can't really use a situation like this to bring such things up very successfully anyway. Not when it involves an innocent person being murdered by a police officer. Looks too much like victim blaming.
 

Pipeline 1010

Golden Member
Dec 2, 2005
1,987
807
136
Go look at statistics of police violence, and it's statistically shocking. Shocking as in it happens much less than the media likes to admit.

Police families experience domestic violence at a rate of 2x - 4x that of the general population. This is a higher rate than NFL player families. How's that for violence statistics? How in the world can you believe that people so violent toward their own beloved families wouldn't be unnecessarily violent toward people they view as degenerates, especially when there is an astronomically high chance they will get away with it?

Can we have a daily mourning on Monday for all the people who die in Chicago each weekend? That's the true outrage, but it doesn't play to people's emotions.

There will be more Chicago murderers convicted this month than the number of cops convicted of murder in the last decade. The outrage here is directed at the fact that the behavior goes unpunished with cops, seemingly for no other reason than cop. How did you fail to grasp the distinction?
 

Pipeline 1010

Golden Member
Dec 2, 2005
1,987
807
136
Is it too much to ask for people to wait until all facts are out, regardless if you're white, black, brown, or yellow?

Who gets to control and determine what the "facts" are? Police officers? That sure works out nicely for cops, doesn't it? Everyone must not discuss nor form opinions on what they saw/heard on video until COPS tell us what we saw and heard and what all the facts are.

May I have the same benefits? Nobody may discuss my potential crimes until my coworker buddies tell them what happened. If you would never consider giving me such protections, then why would you consider it for cops, who self-admittedly should be held to a HIGHER standard?
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
This is seriously fucked up. :mad:

Top to bottom, the government in this country cannot be trusted.
 

Sulaco

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2003
3,825
46
91
You assume I'm only talking about the small world that is Anandtech. I'm talking about everyone who has been exposed to this story.


I don't care how "painful" it is for you to read what I have to say. Again, you want me to be quiet while the rest of you can speak freely.

You have the biggest victim and persecution mentality of almost any individual on here, which is saying something. Perhaps that's what purbeast meant when he says your posts are "painful" to read.

Compounded by the fact that you do exactly what you find so reprehensible in others; lumping groups of people together based on little to no other criteria then the fact they have a different opinion or deign to critique some of your "woe is me" postings.

Criticism and critique &#8800; persecution. Nobody is trying to silence you or marginalize your opinion, and reading your constant martyr ramblings is beyond tedious, and you're simply getting called on it.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
the country is pretty great. However our strength lies in our ability to assimilate all cultures from around the world. That creates points of friction for the dumber less cultured members of our society (mainly midwest rural white people).