Originally posted by: CPA
How is the single player campaign in D2 compared to BGI and II?
Originally posted by: Qbah
Originally posted by: CPA
How is the single player campaign in D2 compared to BGI and II?
D2 is slashing enemies and getting cool items.
BGI and BGII is all about the story - with cool unique items.
It's like asking how do chips and cola compare to soup - both are food but that's about it
Also, I think BGII hasn't aged one bit - thanks mostly to some amazing mods.
Originally posted by: Udgnim
Originally posted by: TidusZ
Originally posted by: CKent
Originally posted by: TidusZ
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
I'd like to see them retool magic and rare item generation a bit to make it possible to find ones that are actually good. As it stands, rare items worth using seem less common than high runes. You end up having the only "good" gear combinations be uniques and runeword items.
Yeah, and when the game first came out all the best gear (esp weapons) were rares. They really went downhill and are definitely pretty useless now.
Play classic, rares are the best gear and actual people play the game, not baalbots and spambots.
I played my share of classic, it was definitely pretty fun for a while. I got sick of doing cow runs with corpse explosion eventually and ended up back in expansion. There seemed to be a more adult crowd there though, and the ladder players were generally pretty cool and helpful.
D2 Exp (read jsp) is completely dominated by kids now
makes me wonder what D3 is going to be like since I would not be surprised if jsp turns out to be the dominant market for D3 transactions
Originally posted by: yusux
an increase in resolution, without a decrease in unit size, make magic and rune finding easier, the game just isn't rewarding enough, it takes months and months to make a "real" descent competative character, unless you plan on eBaying gears, but I doubt blizzard would ever stop leeching on our lives this easily
