• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Blast, Mushroom Cloud Reported in N. Korea

Drift3r

Guest
http://story.news.yahoo.com/ne...p;cid=516&ncid=716

Blast, Mushroom Cloud Reported in N. Korea

By CHRISTOPHER TORCHIA, Associated Press Writer

SEOUL, South Korea - A large explosion occurred in the northern part of North Korea, sending a huge mushroom cloud into the air on an important anniversary of the communist regime, a South Korean news agency reported Sunday.

The Yonhap news agency, citing an unidentified source in Beijing, said the explosion happened Thursday in Yanggang province near the border with China. The explosion in Kim Hyong Jik county blasted a crater big enough to be noticed by a satellite, the source said.

"We understand that a mushroom-shaped cloud about 3.5 to 4 kilometers (about 2-2 1/2 miles) in diameter was monitored during the explosion," Yonhap quoted an unidentified diplomatic source in Seoul as saying.

North Korea was founded Sept. 9, 1948. Leader Kim Jong Il uses the occasion to stage performances and other events to bolster loyalty among the impoverished North Korean population.

Experts have speculated that North Korea might use a major anniversary to conduct a nuclear-related test, though there was no immediate indication that Thursday's reported explosion was linked to Pyongyang's efforts to develop nuclear weapons.

Kim Hyong Jik is reported to hold a major missile base. North Korea, which has a large missile arsenal and more than 1 million soldiers, is dotted with military installations.

South Korea's Unification Minister Chung Dong-young said Sunday the government was in the process of confirming reports there were signs of an explosion in North Korea.

"I am not aware of details such as the size of the damage," he was quoted as saying by Yonhap after a National Security Council meeting.

On Saturday, North Korea said recent revelations that South Korea conducted secret nuclear experiments involving uranium and plutonium made the communist state more determined to pursue its own atomic programs.

The South Korean experiments, conducted in 1982 and 2000, were likely to further complicate the already stalled six-nation talks aimed at dismantling the North's nuclear development. South Korea has said the experiments were purely for research and did not reflect a desire to develop weapons.

On April 22, train wagons at a railway station exploded in the North Korean town of Ryongchon, killing 160 people and injuring an estimated 1,300, according to some estimates. The blast was believed to have been sparked by a train laden with oil and chemicals that hit power lines.

The source in the Yonhap report said Thursday's explosion reportedly was bigger than the train explosion.


 
EDIT: In response to Veramocor - Yes, NK is now a very possible threat. But going after them would surely spark WWIII. Even though it seems to be inevitable.
 
lets all blame bush for n korea getting nukes...after all, anything that goes wrong is his fault, and anything that goes right isnt.
 
Originally posted by: Veramocor
Whupps 'W'.


While you were galavanting across Iraq, it looks like a real threat has emerged in NK. Good job.
Let's not forget who had a doctrine of playing nice with NK in the 90's and created this problem.
 
Originally posted by: Crimson
Are you suggesting we invade Korea? Lets be clear here.
Nah....simply erasing the North of all life would be sufficient, should have been done 50 years ago but the liberals always force the Military to stop before the job is done so we can revisit the conflict in the future.

 
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Veramocor
Whupps 'W'.


While you were galavanting across Iraq, it looks like a real threat has emerged in NK. Good job.
Let's not forget who had a doctrine of playing nice with NK in the 90's and created this problem.


and who ignored NK and wasted our man power and resources on a non-threat called Iraq. We knew about NK's on going nuke program for a loooong time but somehow Iraq was more of a threat ?
 
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: Crimson
Are you suggesting we invade Korea? Lets be clear here.
Nah....simply erasing the North of all life would be sufficient, should have been done 50 years ago but the liberals always force the Military to stop before the job is done so we can revisit the conflict in the future.


I don't think Kim will go out without a fight and I don't think Japan or South Koera and the West Coast of the US would be left on scathed. I doubt that this was a one shot deal and also doubt that they don't have few more waiting in reserve to protect themselves.
 
Originally posted by: Crimson
Are you suggesting we invade Korea? Lets be clear here.


No one is going to invade North Korea now. We had the chance but instead opted to waste our efforts in Iraq.
 
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Veramocor
Whupps 'W'.


While you were galavanting across Iraq, it looks like a real threat has emerged in NK. Good job.
Let's not forget who had a doctrine of playing nice with NK in the 90's and created this problem.


The threat was partially neutralized. The deal was N. Korea would stop producing plutonium from its nuclear reactors. Any plutonium produced already was stored securely and monitored internationally. As part of the deal the US was to build N. Korea two non-plutonium producing nuclear reactors.

N. Korea weaseled its way out of the deal by mining and refining Uranium(not plutonium).

Because of GW piss poor diplomacy (we're going to destroy you and not negotiate), NK has also restarted their old reactors and also started processing their plutonium. So now they could start creating the easier to build plutonium weapons.
 
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: Crimson
Are you suggesting we invade Korea? Lets be clear here.


No one is going to invade North Korea now. We had the chance but instead opted to waste our efforts in Iraq.

Invading North Korea would probably have meant the destruction of South Korea as I understand it. That's the main reason why we didn't and couldn't invade it.
 
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: Crimson
Are you suggesting we invade Korea? Lets be clear here.
Nah....simply erasing the North of all life would be sufficient, should have been done 50 years ago but the liberals always force the Military to stop before the job is done so we can revisit the conflict in the future.

I get it... This is a joke, right? Who again was president during the first Gulf War? Who let Saddam stay in power? No... No, it couldn't of been GHWB? Don't tell me he is uber liberal. :disgust:
 
Originally posted by: StormRider
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: Crimson
Are you suggesting we invade Korea? Lets be clear here.


No one is going to invade North Korea now. We had the chance but instead opted to waste our efforts in Iraq.

Invading North Korea would probably have meant the destruction of South Korea as I understand it. That's the main reason why we didn't and couldn't invade it.

So now that they have nukes who is going to be the first one to charge into NK ?
 
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: Crimson
Are you suggesting we invade Korea? Lets be clear here.


No one is going to invade North Korea now. We had the chance but instead opted to waste our efforts in Iraq.

Moot point. Bush and the neocons were never going to invade NK. They don't have any oil.
 
Originally posted by: cobalt
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: Crimson
Are you suggesting we invade Korea? Lets be clear here.
Nah....simply erasing the North of all life would be sufficient, should have been done 50 years ago but the liberals always force the Military to stop before the job is done so we can revisit the conflict in the future.

I get it... This is a joke, right? Who again was president during the first Gulf War? Who let Saddam stay in power? No... No, it couldn't of been GHWB? Don't tell me he is uber liberal. :disgust:

You are either a liberal blinded dumbass or less than 12 years old. President Bush stopped the war because of all the outcry from the liberals that the job had been done and that we didn't need to go get Saddam.
 
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: cobalt
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: Crimson
Are you suggesting we invade Korea? Lets be clear here.
Nah....simply erasing the North of all life would be sufficient, should have been done 50 years ago but the liberals always force the Military to stop before the job is done so we can revisit the conflict in the future.

I get it... This is a joke, right? Who again was president during the first Gulf War? Who let Saddam stay in power? No... No, it couldn't of been GHWB? Don't tell me he is uber liberal. :disgust:

You are either a liberal blinded dumbass or less than 12 years old. President Bush stopped the war because of all the outcry from the liberals that the job had been done and that we didn't need to go get Saddam.

No Bush Sr. stopped the war because he knew that we would get bogged down in nation building. In fact he said so himself that was a major reason to not go any further. We only had a mandate to free Kuwait and nothing else.
 
Back
Top