Blame Amid the Tragedy

[Zipp]

A very interesting read and it's basically what I thought all along. Now I know that FEMA wasn't perfect in this situation but
you have to admit that some people just came out day one blasting Bush.

Well I guess it was worth a shot for the "Bush haters" ...... I just wouldn't have gone with it ...... Keep trying though.

Text

 

[NoSmirk]

Very good article.

 

[Duckzilla]

Originally posted by: Zipp
A very interesting read and it's basically what I thought all along. Now I know that FEMA wasn't perfect in this situation but
you have to admit that some people just came out day one blasting Bush.

Well I guess it was worth a shot for the "Bush haters" ...... I just wouldn't have gone with it ...... Keep trying though.

Text

Look at any other article at this website and it'll put things in perspective. It's got Republican written all over it. The Wall Street Journal, surely they are all Democrats.

 

[ntdz]

Originally posted by: Duckzilla

Originally posted by: Zipp
A very interesting read and it's basically what I thought all along. Now I know that FEMA wasn't perfect in this situation but
you have to admit that some people just came out day one blasting Bush.

Well I guess it was worth a shot for the "Bush haters" ...... I just wouldn't have gone with it ...... Keep trying though.

Text

Look at any other article at this website and it'll put things in perspective. It's got Republican written all over it. The Wall Street Journal, surely they are all Democrats.

Does the fact it's probably writen by a conservative somehow make it not true?

 

[Proletariat]

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Duckzilla

Originally posted by: Zipp
A very interesting read and it's basically what I thought all along. Now I know that FEMA wasn't perfect in this situation but
you have to admit that some people just came out day one blasting Bush.

Well I guess it was worth a shot for the "Bush haters" ...... I just wouldn't have gone with it ...... Keep trying though.

Text

Look at any other article at this website and it'll put things in perspective. It's got Republican written all over it. The Wall Street Journal, surely they are all Democrats.

Does the fact it's probably writen by a conservative somehow make it not true?

Yea its pretty clear that its biased completely. Its an opinion piece not an article.

 

[ntdz]

Originally posted by: Proletariat

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Duckzilla

Originally posted by: Zipp
A very interesting read and it's basically what I thought all along. Now I know that FEMA wasn't perfect in this situation but
you have to admit that some people just came out day one blasting Bush.

Well I guess it was worth a shot for the "Bush haters" ...... I just wouldn't have gone with it ...... Keep trying though.

Text

Look at any other article at this website and it'll put things in perspective. It's got Republican written all over it. The Wall Street Journal, surely they are all Democrats.

Does the fact it's probably writen by a conservative somehow make it not true?

Yea its pretty clear that its biased completely. Its an opinion piece not an article.

So bias makes it false? I just wanna be clear about what you're saying

 

[Proletariat]

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Proletariat

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Duckzilla

Originally posted by: Zipp
A very interesting read and it's basically what I thought all along. Now I know that FEMA wasn't perfect in this situation but
you have to admit that some people just came out day one blasting Bush.

Well I guess it was worth a shot for the "Bush haters" ...... I just wouldn't have gone with it ...... Keep trying though.

Text

Look at any other article at this website and it'll put things in perspective. It's got Republican written all over it. The Wall Street Journal, surely they are all Democrats.

Does the fact it's probably writen by a conservative somehow make it not true?

Yea its pretty clear that its biased completely. Its an opinion piece not an article.

So bias makes it false? I just wanna be clear about what you're saying

Its not an article. Its an opinion piece.

 

[ntdz]

Originally posted by: Proletariat

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Proletariat

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Duckzilla

Originally posted by: Zipp
A very interesting read and it's basically what I thought all along. Now I know that FEMA wasn't perfect in this situation but
you have to admit that some people just came out day one blasting Bush.

Well I guess it was worth a shot for the "Bush haters" ...... I just wouldn't have gone with it ...... Keep trying though.

Text

Look at any other article at this website and it'll put things in perspective. It's got Republican written all over it. The Wall Street Journal, surely they are all Democrats.

Does the fact it's probably writen by a conservative somehow make it not true?

Yea its pretty clear that its biased completely. Its an opinion piece not an article.

So bias makes it false? I just wanna be clear about what you're saying

Its not an article. Its an opinion piece.

Yes, I realize that, I read it. You are basically saying his OP-ED is false because he's "biased," which doesn't make sense.

 

[Duckzilla]

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Proletariat

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Proletariat

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Duckzilla

Originally posted by: Zipp
A very interesting read and it's basically what I thought all along. Now I know that FEMA wasn't perfect in this situation but
you have to admit that some people just came out day one blasting Bush.

Well I guess it was worth a shot for the "Bush haters" ...... I just wouldn't have gone with it ...... Keep trying though.

Text

Look at any other article at this website and it'll put things in perspective. It's got Republican written all over it. The Wall Street Journal, surely they are all Democrats.

Does the fact it's probably writen by a conservative somehow make it not true?

Yea its pretty clear that its biased completely. Its an opinion piece not an article.

So bias makes it false? I just wanna be clear about what you're saying

Its not an article. Its an opinion piece.

Yes, I realize that, I read it. You are basically saying his OP-ED is false because he's "biased," which doesn't make sense.

It's the friggin' Wall Street Journal, come to your own conclusion.

 

[Proletariat]

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Proletariat

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Proletariat

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Duckzilla

Originally posted by: Zipp
A very interesting read and it's basically what I thought all along. Now I know that FEMA wasn't perfect in this situation but
you have to admit that some people just came out day one blasting Bush.

Well I guess it was worth a shot for the "Bush haters" ...... I just wouldn't have gone with it ...... Keep trying though.

Text

Look at any other article at this website and it'll put things in perspective. It's got Republican written all over it. The Wall Street Journal, surely they are all Democrats.

Does the fact it's probably writen by a conservative somehow make it not true?

Yea its pretty clear that its biased completely. Its an opinion piece not an article.

So bias makes it false? I just wanna be clear about what you're saying

Its not an article. Its an opinion piece.

Yes, I realize that, I read it. You are basically saying his OP-ED is false because he's "biased," which doesn't make sense.

Its false because it solely places the blame on two people who had much less power than Bush.

 

[daniel49]

I have noticed that about the democratic party the last 10 years. They no longer discuss issues or provide ideas, thier whole agenda is how can we make the other guys look bad.

Not unexpected, just not a viable political alternative.

 

[nageov3t]

so, cutting beneath the rhetoric, he's saying that both the local, state, and federal government messed up.

great.

thanks captain obvious :thumbsup:

 

[nageov3t]

Originally posted by: daniel49
I have noticed that about 99.99999% of politicians in the history of human existance. They no longer discuss issues or provide ideas, thier whole agenda is how can we make the other guys look bad.

fixed that for ya.

 

[Proletariat]

Originally posted by: daniel49
I have noticed that about the democratic party the last 10 years. They no longer discuss issues or provide ideas, thier whole agenda is how can we make the other guys look bad.

Not unexpected, just not a viable political alternative.

Ideas? Name one new idea that the Republicans have had in the past 10 years? Hmmm.. maybe the Iraq War... No wait Bush Sr. already proposed and opposed that because of its tremendous stupidity. My bad.

Republican 'ideas' - end welfare, cut taxes, stop affirmative action, stop abortion. Hmmm.... all liberal, democratic ideals.

Seems more like Republicans are the ones just bad mouthing all of the 'other guys' ideals.

 

[arsbanned]

Originally posted by: loki8481
so, cutting beneath the rhetoric, he's saying that both the local, state, and federal government messed up.

great.

thanks captain obvious :thumbsup:

Yep. Meanwhile, the wanna bes in here keep up their shrill wailing and the country continues to look pathetic to the rest of the World. Nice job!

 

[conjur]

Evergreen Freedom Foundation? WTF is that?

BTW, here's some info to stop that spin:
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2005/9/7/142737/2117