cmdrdredd
Lifer
- Dec 12, 2001
- 27,052
- 357
- 126
Wrong, you're creating a false definition of a word to suit your argument. Upgrade doesn't mean leaps and bounds ahead of what was replaced, I'm not going to bother with a dictionary, you know this. You would say a "huge upgrade" or something along those lines to denote such an improvement. While I will concede that the engine used only receives minor upgrades, it's still an upgrade nonetheless, the new is better than the old. BLOPS 2 uses DX 11 -- upgrade. The question isn't upgrade or not an upgrade, but how much of an upgrade.
I've never owned a CoD game, but just look at some videos, BLOPS 2 looks noticeably better than CoD 4, the engine has been upgraded. I'm certain you'll come back and reply with "semantics", but to someone like me who has no stake in the argument, is neither a fanboy or a hater, the engine has clearly been upgraded over the years. How big of an upgrade is the only debate, to argue that there has been no upgrade, no improvement at all, is a point you can't successfully argue.
Uses DX11? There is no tessellation, no compute shaders. I bet they just used the DX11 compression features and then use that as a basis to advertise "this is a DX11 enabled game" when in fact it's still running off DX9. What was said is correct. They use the same engine with very very minor tweaks that do nothing visually. Of course it looks a little better...we have cards that can do better filtering and AA.