• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Black Coaches in N.B.A. Have Shorter Tenures

Mucho

Guest

By DAVID LEONHARDT and FORD FESSENDEN

Published: March 22, 2005
The New York Times

The men coaching N.B.A. teams in recent seasons have looked like no other group of head coaches in the history of major American professional sports. Today, 10 of the league's 30 coaches are black, ranging from young former players like Terry Porter in Milwaukee to veterans of multiple coaching jobs like Bernie Bickerstaff in Charlotte.

At a time when the National Football League can count only 10 black head coaches in its history, the National Basketball Association has reached a position rare for any business: when a black coach or executive is hired or fired, almost nobody mentions race. Opportunity in the N.B.A. appears to have become color blind.
But the coaches who have received those opportunities have not had much time to enjoy them. In a pattern that has gone largely unnoticed, except among black coaches themselves, white coaches have been holding on to their jobs for significantly longer than black coaches. Yesterday, the Cleveland Cavaliers fired Paul Silas, who was in his second season with the team.
Over the last decade, black N.B.A. coaches have lasted an average of just 1.6 seasons, compared with 2.4 seasons for white coaches, according to a review of coaching records by The New York Times. That means the typical white coach lasts almost 50 percent longer and has most of an extra season to prove himself.
This month alone, three of the six black coaches who had held their jobs for more than a season have been fired, including Silas, who had eight years of N.B.A coaching experience before joining Cleveland. The Orlando Magic dismissed Johnny Davis last Thursday after less than two seasons. On March 2, the Portland Trail Blazers fired

Maurice Cheeks, then the black coach with the second-longest tenure; he had lasted almost four seasons."Our white counterparts are given more the benefit of the doubt," Silas said in an interview in January. "Things have changed dramatically in our society, but it still has a long way to go."
The gap has created a deep division among coaches and executives, one that splits largely but not exclusively along racial lines. Some, including Commissioner David Stern, said the numbers surprised them and called them largely a coincidence. Doc Rivers, the coach of the Boston Celtics, who is black, said he thought that owners and general managers now gave white and black coaches equal chances to succeed.
The league, some people said, is simply too competitive for race to affect executives.
"I believe that right now each coaching decision is based on a fierce determination made by the owner and general manager that they want to win - and that that decision has become color blind," Stern said. He called the league "the best example of equal-opportunity employment, even if against the judgment of perfection it isn't there yet."
The contrast in tenures might be most easily seen among coaches with the greatest longevity. Of the 14 N.B.A. coaches who have held jobs for at least five seasons since 1989, only one has been black - Lenny Wilkens, in Atlanta, from 1993 to 2000 - despite the fact that teams began to hire black coaches in large numbers in the late 1980's. The three active N.B.A. coaches with the longest tenure are all white, and they have been in place for about a decade on average.
The pattern holds in almost any important category of coaches. Winning black coaches have been replaced sooner than winning white coaches on average, and experienced black coaches have served shorter tenures than experienced white coaches. The same is true among losing coaches, among rookie coaches and among coaches who played in the N.B.A. and those who did not.
Text
 
Maybe they are smarter than the white man. (i.e. why keep working when you have enough cash to live in style for your natural life + 150 years???)
 
here's my (politically incorrect) theory: black players play harder for white coaches. black players view black coaches more as "equals" or "friends" rather than superiors. when you view your superior as your equal, you question their authority and, sometimes unknowingly, slack-off. soon, the black coach looses the respect of the team and he is fired.
 
Originally posted by: iamme
here's my (politically incorrect) theory: black players play harder for white coaches. black players view black coaches more as "equals" or "friends" rather than superiors. when you view your superior as your equal, you question their authority and, sometimes unknowingly, slack-off. soon, the black coach looses the respect of the team and he is fired.

very politically incorrect I like.



My theory goes like this though: Some black coaches suck, therefore they are fired.


*edit* of course some white coaches suck too, and Ive seen them fired. And if there were mexican coaches, maybe they'd suck at times too. Dunno if you could fire them though...
 
jeez people will call racism on anything these says...

didn't paul silas coach charlotte for a long time before cleveland?
 
Head coaches in professional sports (NFL & NBA) in particular are under a microscope and in a very volitile position. They are often times brought into piss poor programs or into small markets without a lot of support and asked to perform wonders when they can't stand up to the hype they get canned.

I wonder what percentage of these coaches that are having "short tenures" are getting put into these crappy markets with nothing to work with and expected to make miracles. Then can't live up to the lofty expectations and are put on the chopping block.

 
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Yet another diabolical conspiracy set forth by the white devil.

wait...isn't the devil red?

wouldn't that make him Native American or maybe Communist?
 
Take out the longest-tenured few coaches (Dallas just did this, come to think of it) and I suspect the numbers might even out a bit. With such a small sample size, 2-3 exceptional samples can skew the results.
 
How come black people cry discrimination when black coaches aren't as successful as white coaches, yet white people can't cry discrimination when 90% of the millionaire NBA players are black?

Also the reasons given aren't consistent. When whites are more successful at a certain task it's due to racism and discrimination, yet when blacks do better at a certain task it's because they're better or they just try harder. If you're going to complain about a disproportionate amount of whites doing well at a certain task, at least be fair and complain when a disproportionate amount of blacks do well at a certain task.
 
In any professional sports, wins = job security, losses = fire. End of story. There is nothing else to it.

The owners pay big money for the team, the players, and the coaches. They want to win. Losses = players get trade/release, coaches = fire.

 
Maybe, because they end up with crappier teams? If they start out with a crappy team and can't show drastic improvement then they get fired......
 
maybe it's because most black coaches were former players, so they're not as solid in the X and Os as white coaches (who usually have more coaching background).

Instead, they are "player's coaches", and while that works for awhile, it wears thin faster than solid fundamental coaching.
 
Back
Top