• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Billionaires Funding Vast Climate Denial Network

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
DrPizza said:
I'm calling you out on your bullshit. For P&N, my response was relatively tame. You've responded to far worse on many occasions. The only reason you're not responding to the rest of my post is that I provided proof that you're wrong & you have zero counter-argument for it.
Click to expand...
You aren't calling out anything. You're being a condescending tool, little more, and I am calling you out on that.

Show that anthropogenic warming is the ONLY cause of climate change. Hell, show me what percentage of climate change is due to AGW. Guess what? You can't with any precision worth a shit or a care.

It has become obvious that there are other factors involved in the current changing climate whether they be solar variance, gamma rays, orbital variances (eccentricities, precession, axial tilt - i.e. Milankovich cycles), or any other number of potential possibilities. But we have a bunch of fucking political tools screaming about AGW and pretending that's all there is to it so that's where all the funding for studies go and anything else is sorely negelected. And, of course, idiots on the internet seem to believe that CO2 is the complete answer and their collective voices of idiocy drown out any sanity on the issue.

Yet you want to be a condescending twit to people like me? You need to recalibrate your scopes, pal, and align them along the lines of reality and facts on the issue.
 
Matt1970 said:
That's storm surge. Sandy's storm surge was 14 feet in some places. But if you want to blame your childhood home being destroyed on the few inches the ocean has risen since your house was built, go ahead.
Click to expand...
The increase in relative sea level is likely to increase a 100-year storm surge event 5-fold, to every 20 years...

Yet, to you ideologues, you'll just keep your blinders on to dishonestly claim no ill-effects will result..

A bit of extra depth adds an enormous increase in mass of water that will contribute to inundation against low-lying areas... Again, that'll be irrationally dismissed as inconsequential to you lot of partisan driven, ideologue deniers.

The rest of us will consider rational studies and existing physics for real world warnings and contingency plans.
 
Whiskey16 said:
The increase in relative sea level is likely to increase a 100-year storm surge event 5-fold, to every 20 years...

Yet, to you ideologues, you'll just keep your blinders on to dishonestly claim no ill-effects will result..

A bit of extra depth adds an enormous increase in mass of water that will contribute to inundation against low-lying areas... Again, that'll be irrationally dismissed as inconsequential to you lot of partisan driven, ideologue deniers.

The rest of us will consider rational studies and existing physics for real world warnings and contingency plans.
Click to expand...

You're blaming some of the flooding of New Jersey and New York in 2012 due to Sandy's storm surge on numbers that may not become true for 37 years and you try to call us irrational? You're a fucking dumb shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top