Originally posted by: Lemon law
Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan where democracy was supposed to win without any opposition were badly bungled because local insurgencies arose to take advantage of the anarchy and corruption,
Agreed. But let's not forget that this foreign policy has been carried over for decades. And it was Clinton who made it policy for the removal of Saddam, and sanctions before the war that were responsible for hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths. Now let's not spin this as any kind of defense of Bush and Cheney's decision to invade, because it certainly is not. But let's not conveniently forget everything that happened regarding Iraq before Bush took office.
giving tax cuts to mainly the rich did not stimulate the economy, resulting in a big drop in spending power for the middle class while the rich used their money to chase cheap labor abroad,
It certainly didn't, because cutting taxes for anyone without cutting spending appropriately just makes matters worse. But this isn't the big picture. The plan wasn't just to cut taxes for the wealthy and stimulate the economy. Included in that plan were to increase government spending and continue irresponsible policies of flooding the economy with new money and enticing further borrowing.
and on the business front, a massive assault on governmental regulations had a great deal to do with the total economic collapse of the banking system.
Pardon me, but it was the Republican congress and President Clinton who passed and signed into law the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
And even after it became apparent that the voting public was disgusted with the policies of the GWB administration with the resulting loss of republican control of both wings of the legislative branch after the election of 11/06, the GOP leadership did everything possible to maintain GWB lockstep control during the next two years, resulting in gridlock.
And now, assuming Franken wins the MN seat, the GOP is only one Senate seat away from being totally irrelevant.
Yup, but it doesn't seem to matter, because all of the important policies, foreign and domestic, haven't changed one bit. It's just the other team playing ball now. We're still bogged down in Iraq, with ever-changing timetable for leaving. There's plans to increase the amount of troops in Afghanistan, a dead-end war, with no logical exit strategy.
And in regards to the economy, Obama and Congress are doing the same things that Clinton and Bush did to "stimulate." Flooding the market with new money? Yup. Artificially low interest rates? Yup. Increase government spending? Yup. Lower taxes? Well, they would if they actually could. So increased deficits? Yup, record breaking. At least Clinton tried to pay off some debt.
And now the GOP has become only the party of NO, advocating policies that are proven failures.
Definitely not. But yes, they are now the party of "no." Every time a Democrat gets into the Oval Office, the Republicans become small-government conservatives. But how can you not see that what they are advocating certainly are not proven failures? I mean, when they had control of things, they didn't follow what they are now advocating. They didn't cut government spending. They didn't protect the dollar. They didn't balance a budget. They did what Obama is doing, just not to scale.
MY comment is and remains, the GOP leadership is still stuck in lala land, while most of the GOP electorate is not. And until the GOP learns the lessons of the past eight years, they cannot start to rebuild.
Agreed.
Even as a fairly partisan democrat, I understand democratic excesses can be equally dangerous, which is why we need both government regulation of business and a strong GOP to keep the various parties honest.
The GOP may be off to a poor start in 2009, but if they chuck their existing leadership, and rally around someone rational, they can get the job done.
The sad thing is, LL, they don't have to. All they have to do is wait for the Democrats to fail. And it is inevitable that they will. Why? Because they're running the same damn policies, which have been proven wrong. And worse, have been proven to make things exponentially worse in the long run.