• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bill Clinton, Inc

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
ivwshane said:
I'm pretty sure he has a thing for doucey and hannity. He's seems to be attracted to stupid.
Click to expand...
My dear sweet ivwshane. Hear I am trying to extend to you the courtesy of speaking in your native tongue by talking out of my ass. Perhaps I am using the wrong dialect?
 
ivwshane said:
That's not my native tongue but I must say you've mastered the language quite well!
Click to expand...
It's not? But you are so fluent in it? I was going to invest in an ass Rosetta Stone, but I was able to pick it up just fine by minicking you. It's true what they say about immersion.

Now I can finally afford to add a dock to my trailer by the river
 
Starbuck1975 said:
It's not? But you are so fluent in it? I was going to invest in an ass Rosetta Stone, but I was able to pick it up just fine by minicking you. It's true what they say about immersion.

Now I can finally afford to add a dock to my trailer by the river
Click to expand...

Yeah I like to mimic those I respond to. Your timeline seems to be off though, as I recall, you've been talking out of your ass well before I started posting on p&n.

Btw, where I'm from we don't call that a river, it's called a sewage canal but ignorance is bliss, I guess.
 
ivwshane said:
Yeah I like to mimic those I respond to. Your timeline seems to be off though, as I recall, you've been talking out of your ass well before I started posting on p&n.

Btw, where I'm from we don't call that a river, it's called a sewage canal but ignorance is bliss, I guess.
Click to expand...
You joined five years before me, but facts and data tend to elude you
 
ivwshane said:
As is the case with most of the things you read, reading comprehension is a skill you simply do not possess (hint: I've only been posting on p&n since 08-09).
Click to expand...
You got me. Admittedly, I often overlook childish semantics. The next time you float by my trailer in the sewage canal, give me a shout out. I'll offer you a beer.
 
Zstream said:
You honestly think the Russians hacked the email system? You really believe that shit?
Click to expand...

Did you have contrary evidence? Does your evidence come from anyone of any credibility? Is the a reason your evidence isn't cited by the intelligence community or the US government?

Its funny how your posts sounds exactly like putins response on the matter.
 
ivwshane said:
Did you have contrary evidence? Does your evidence come from anyone of any credibility? Is the a reason your evidence isn't cited by the intelligence community or the US government?

Its funny how your posts sounds exactly like putins response on the matter.
Click to expand...

Ok, you claim the Russians have hacked the system. I'll put the same requirement to you. Please provide proof or evidence that shows the Russians hacked the email system. I'm not talking about a stupid "oh the IP was Russian, so it must be them". That's not how it works, if you're anything in IT.

Now, Wikileaks was founded by whistleblowers. If you can't wrap your head around the fact your presidential candidate is a corrupt fool, and people can't stand it... well nothing will change your mind by now.
 
Zstream said:
You honestly think the Russians hacked the email system? You really believe that shit?
Click to expand...
That's what pretty much all the agencies that have looked into it found. This is not a case of whistleblowing, it's a case of stolen info from a hacked email account.
But continue being a useful idiot. Putin loves guys like you.
 
ivwshane said:
You overlook a lot of things and that's kind of the point here.
Click to expand...
Do you even have a point. I made a passing and not even remotely interesting comment about cable news, and you decided that was your in to throw a jab. You do it often. You are rarely accurate.

I am not sure what your deal is.
 
senseamp said:
That's what pretty much all the agencies that have looked into it found. This is not a case of whistleblowing, it's a case of stolen info from a hacked email account.
But continue being a useful idiot. Putin loves guys like you.
Click to expand...
All of the articles I have read cite anonymous insiders, former acting intelligence experts or other undisclosed sources. Most statements from the Obama administration fall short of directly blaming the Russian government.

If their is evidence of collusion between Trump and the Russian government, why not bring charges and end this charade?
 
Starbuck1975 said:
Admittedly, I often overlook childish semantics. The next time you float by my trailer in the sewage canal, give me a shout out.
Click to expand...

Project often ?

You're almost the epitome of spewing childish semantics, just on this one page there are multiple ones.

Trump's refusal to accept intelligence briefing on Russia stuns experts

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...elligence-briefing-russia-20161014-story.html

Top Democrats Call on FBI to Investigate Trump Ties to Russia Over Hacking

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/201...tigate-trump-ties-russia-over-hacking-n666696

There is a whole thread on ATOT somewhere related to it.
 
Last edited:
MongGrel said:
Project often ?

You're almost the epitome of spewing childish semantics, just on this one page there are multiple ones.

Trump's refusal to accept intelligence briefing on Russia stuns experts

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...elligence-briefing-russia-20161014-story.html

Top Democrats Call on FBI to Investigate Trump Ties to Russia Over Hacking

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/201...tigate-trump-ties-russia-over-hacking-n666696

There is a whole thread on ATOT somewhere related to it.
Click to expand...
Shrug. Yours is my favorite avatar and I often enjoy your posts.
 
Zstream said:
You honestly think the Russians hacked the email system? You really believe that shit?
Click to expand...

There's this, from people who know a helluva lot more about it than either of us-

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsr...23-joint-dhs-odni-election-security-statement

Or is that some kind of conspiracy?

Whoever the parties are it's clear that their timing is intended to influence our election. Strangely enough, Trump asked for the release of more hacked information & he got it.

What does it mean, Mr Wizard?
 
Zstream said:
Ok, you claim the Russians have hacked the system. I'll put the same requirement to you. Please provide proof or evidence that shows the Russians hacked the email system. I'm not talking about a stupid "oh the IP was Russian, so it must be them". That's not how it works, if you're anything in IT.

Now, Wikileaks was founded by whistleblowers. If you can't wrap your head around the fact your presidential candidate is a corrupt fool, and people can't stand it... well nothing will change your mind by now.
Click to expand...

Oh golly! How hard will it be to provide proof?!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...0b9654-8cbf-11e6-875e-2c1bfe943b66_story.html


The intelligence community has for weeks been confident that hackers tied to Russian spy agencies were behind the DNC hack. Senior officials at the Justice Department and DHS pressed the White House to go public with an accusation.

But a number of administration officials were worried that such a statement would appear to politicize the issue in the weeks before the election. They were also concerned about the Kremlin’s reaction and about inadvertently disclosing sensitive intelligence sources and methods.
Click to expand...

I'll take your lack of proof as you admitting you were wrong.
 
Starbuck1975 said:
All of the articles I have read cite anonymous insiders, former acting intelligence experts or other undisclosed sources. Most statements from the Obama administration fall short of directly blaming the Russian government.

If their is evidence of collusion between Trump and the Russian government, why not bring charges and end this charade?
Click to expand...

Because unlike Republicans and their Russian handlers, Democrats don't threaten to jail their political opponents. It's up to the voters to decide if they want a pro-Russian useful idiot as president.
 
Stronger together eh Hillary? Working hard for the working class and you were so broke. Yeah right. LOL.

D or R, they both work for the stinking rich.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top