• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bill Clinton for UN General Sec

Originally posted by: KeyserSoze
Nice, BJ's for EVERY country!!!!!!!!!!!! 😀


KeyserSoze
Click to expand...

Yep, now Clinton can get the young and ugly women from such countries as Mozambique, Bulgaria, Thailand, and Syria.

 
Originally posted by: Queasy
Fixed Link

He's already campaigning for it by showing up on Larry King Live and bashing the U.S. and the current administration.
Click to expand...

Do you really think he's bashing Bush?? From most of the comments I've seen, he's been in support of war. Which reminds me of his traditional way of selling out on the left.
I think Clinton would be a great Sec. General. He's a uniter not a divider.
 
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: KeyserSoze
Nice, BJ's for EVERY country!!!!!!!!!!!! 😀


KeyserSoze
Click to expand...

Yep, now Clinton can get the young and ugly women from such countries as Mozambique, Bulgaria, Thailand, and Syria.
Click to expand...

LOL - world booty tour. 😀
 
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: Queasy
Fixed Link

He's already campaigning for it by showing up on Larry King Live and bashing the U.S. and the current administration.
Click to expand...

Do you really think he's bashing Bush?? From most of the comments I've seen, he's been in support of war. Which reminds me of his traditional way of selling out on the left.
I think Clinton would be a great Sec. General. He's a uniter not a divider.
Click to expand...

<shivers at thought of Clinton heading the UN>

He hasn't been in support of the war. He's been busy covering his butt from the mistakes he made with North Korea, Bin Laden, and Iraq during his administration. He's also calling for more inspections and politically laying the blame on Bush.

John McCain was on the radio yesterday and said that both Clinton and Jimmah Carter need to "Shut Up" about Iraq. He stated that it is an unwritten rule that former presidents do not speak out against current administrations and that Carter and Clinton have been the only ones to violate this rule.
 
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: Queasy
Fixed Link

He's already campaigning for it by showing up on Larry King Live and bashing the U.S. and the current administration.
Click to expand...

Do you really think he's bashing Bush?? From most of the comments I've seen, he's been in support of war. Which reminds me of his traditional way of selling out on the left.
I think Clinton would be a great Sec. General. He's a uniter not a divider.
Click to expand...

<shivers at thought of Clinton heading the UN>

He hasn't been in support of the war. He's been busy covering his butt from the mistakes he made with North Korea, Bin Laden, and Iraq during his administration. He's also calling for more inspections and politically laying the blame on Bush.

John McCain was on the radio yesterday and said that both Clinton and Jimmah Carter need to "Shut Up" about Iraq. He stated that it is an unwritten rule that former presidents do not speak out against current administrations and that Carter and Clinton have been the only ones to violate this rule.
Click to expand...

North Korea is not Clinton's fault. Why was the crisis 6 monthes old before the admin. finally admitted to the media what was going on??
Clinton no chance to take out bin Laden. There were a few instances where intelligence knew of bin Laden's location, but Clinton and his advisors (including the military brass) agreed that the info was too old.
Why did the Bush admin. ignore the briefings given by Clinton's admin. regarding bin Laden. Terrorism was not a priority of the Bush admin. during 2000. It was of Clinton's.
As for presidents not talking about each other, the "tradition" does not exist:
From mediawhoresonline:


Ex-President John Adams on his successor Thomas Jefferson:

"a party man full of party spirit..."

a man "who leaves the government infinitely worse than he found it."

Ex-President John Quincy Adams on his successor Andrew Jackson:

"a barbarian who could not write a sentence of grammar and hardly could spell his own name."

Ex-President Theodore Roosevelt on his successor William Howard Taft:

"a flubdub with a streak of the second-rate and the common in him."

a "flintlock" conservative who "twisted around" Roosevelt's policies.

Ex-President Herbert Hoover on his successor Franklin Delano Roosevelt:

In 1936, publishes an entire collection of anti-F.D.R. speeches with the unsubtle title: American Ideals Versus the New Deal.

Ex-President Harry S. Truman on his successor Dwight D. Eisenhower:

@#$% *&=+%$#&!!!

Ex-President Harry S. Truman on his successor Richard M. Nixon:

Ditto above, except harsher.

Ex-President Richard M. Nixon on his successor George H. W. Bush:

See especially Nixon's post-presidential writings on foreign policy, especially his book Seize the Moment (1992).

Ex-President George H.W. Bush on his successor, Bill Clinton:

In 2000, told a national television audience that he would "tell the nation what I think about [Clinton] as a human being" if he didn't stop criticizing Bush's son.
 
Bill Clinton for UN General Sec
Click to expand...
Ehh...sounds dangerous to me. Clinton and the UN have been mainstays of the American comedy scene in recent years. Bringing them together into some kind of unholy union could spawn The Ultimate Joke, a lethal force that would quickly spread like a virus through TV screens and across watercoolers throughout the nation. Millions could die laughing in their workplaces, or even in the comfort of their own homes.

*shudder*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top