• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

BILD newspaper (widest circulation in Europe) endorses Bush

Perhaps the largest October surprise in Germany is the BILD newspaper?s endorsement of President George W. Bush. BILD, which has the widest circulation of any newspaper in Europe, lists the following 10 reasons why Bush should be re-elected:

Update: The list we had up earlier was an abbreviated summary of the 10 reasons. We have now translated BILD?s list of reasons in their entirety. Here they are:

1. Bush has clear priorities. He sees the inhuman Islamic fundamentalism and the murderous mullahs as the largest danger for the Western world.

2. Bush has learned the lessons of history. Military strength, not pleasant talk, is the only thing that helps against violent fanatics. And with Bush ? unlike with Kerry ? there is no doubt about this.

3. Under Bush, the US, as a superpower, will continue to bear the financial, military and casualty burden in the fight against terrorism in a ?holy war? which Islamic fanatics unilaterally declared. [It?s ultimately about the cash-flow, Damen und Herren. ?ed.]

4. Along with fighting terror and the terrorists, a re-elected Bush will do everything he can to prevent nuclear proliferation. That is especially true with regard to the nuclear ambitions of Iran and North Korea.

5. Bush has learned that America can defeat every country in war, but needs allies in peace. Thus, his second term will be characterized by cooperation with international partners. But he will not depend on how Syria or Libya vote at the UN.

6. Bush knows that Europe and Germany don?t have the military at their disposal to become involved in any further foreign military engagements. Therefore he won?t ask them for help. Kerry will do exactly that ? and will further burden already damaged German-American relations.

7. Under Bush, America will remain a reliable partner for Israel in its fight for survival. That must especially be in our German interest.

8. Republicans have always been stronger supporters of free trade than Democrats. That is also true of Bush when compared to Kerry. And that is good for Germany as an export nation.

9. Every new American administration makes mistakes. Bush has already made his. Kerry, on the other hand, has of yet held no (executive) position in the government. He would be worse prepared than most Presidents preceding him.

10. With Bush, we know what to expect. With Kerry, nobody knows what he stands for and where he wants to lead America ? and the world.
 
9. Every new American administration makes mistakes. Bush has already made his. Kerry, on the other hand, has of yet held no (executive) position in the government. He would be worse prepared than most Presidents preceding him.
=======================================================

After 4 years, it's OLD now.

The only choice Americans have in this Election is the choice to stay with the OLD or give someone else a try for the next 4 years.

Like I've said, it's simply a matter of if you like the way things have gone for the past 4 years you stay with what you have, if you don't like it you vote for a chance at change.

 
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: Czar
linking isnt hard now is it?

Typical liberal...wants everyone to do every thing for him; "googling" isn't hard now is it? You think I made this up?

you are trying to give us information and without a source most people just dont bother since it might just as well be some made up stuff you got in email

Even think that somewhat that its illegal to post copyrighted text without providing a source. But who cares, why is it hard to paste one line at the top or bottom of your post?
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
9. Every new American administration makes mistakes. Bush has already made his. Kerry, on the other hand, has of yet held no (executive) position in the government. He would be worse prepared than most Presidents preceding him.
=======================================================

After 4 years, it's OLD now.

The only choice Americans have in this Election is the choice to stay with the OLD or give someone else a try for the next 4 years.

Like I've said, it's simply a matter of if you like the way things have gone for the past 4 years you stay with what you have, if you don't like it you vote for a chance at change.

I refuse to believe that you are Dave, since you failed to use "neocon" in your post. Please look to the top right of your page under "logout" and register a new screename that properly reflects your persona. I know you are prolly holding Dave hostage but please know he has friends and they will come to his resuce, eventually.

On topic, it is interesting that this German pub has endorsed bush. I wonder how he'll do in the electorate over there? j/k, I know their vote doesn't count.
 
"Most Germans believe in Kerry





The endorsement for Bush by the German daily follows an editorial Tuesday in Europe's biggest financial newspaper the Financial Times backing Kerry.



Meanwhile a poll for Stern weekly magazine to be published Thursday showed that a clear majority of Germans believe Kerry will win the Nov. 2 election.



The survey conducted Oct. 21 and 22 among 1,004 Germans found that 59 percent tipped Kerry to take the Oval Office versus 31 percent expecting a Bush victory. Ten percent did not venture a prediction."

Of course, if Bush is relying on tabloid endorsements, this is not the one he really needs.

-Robert
 
"Bush has learned his lesson"

"The conservative daily said the incumbent president now knew from his experiences in Iraq that he needed the support of a broad base of partners and would foster those alliances more than in his first term."

"Bush has learned that America can conquer any country militarily but cannot win the peace by going it alone," he said. "That is why he will focus more on international cooperation in his second term."

Linky poo

Bild is a tabloid newspaper. Might as well have been the Weekly World News endorsing Bush.
 
Not publishing the link is usually a good sign the OP saw something in the article that he didn't like. 🙂

-Robert
 
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: Czar
linking isnt hard now is it?

Typical liberal...wants everyone to do every thing for him; "googling" isn't hard now is it? You think I made this up?

you are trying to give us information and without a source most people just dont bother since it might just as well be some made up stuff you got in email

Even think that somewhat that its illegal to post copyrighted text without providing a source. But who cares, why is it hard to paste one line at the top or bottom of your post?

Umm... it's credited to the source - you can hardly claim copyright infringement or even intellectual dishonesty here.

And if you doubt that the text really comes from the claimed source, you're quite free to check it out.

I don't agree with the reasoning of the endorsement, but xxJGxx hasn't done anything wrong by posting it the way he did.
 
Europe's top-selling newspaper, the German tabloid Bild, endorsed George W. Bush for US president Tuesday, saying he would do a better job fighting terror and wouldn't ask Berlin to send troops to Iraq.

LOL. Tabloid? They are right though, Bush never asks for help.
 
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: Czar
linking isnt hard now is it?

Typical liberal...wants everyone to do every thing for him; "googling" isn't hard now is it? You think I made this up?

you are trying to give us information and without a source most people just dont bother since it might just as well be some made up stuff you got in email

Even think that somewhat that its illegal to post copyrighted text without providing a source. But who cares, why is it hard to paste one line at the top or bottom of your post?

Umm... it's credited to the source - you can hardly claim copyright infringement or even intellectual dishonesty here.

And if you doubt that the text really comes from the claimed source, you're quite free to check it out.

I don't agree with the reasoning of the endorsement, but xxJGxx hasn't done anything wrong by posting it the way he did.
you see, in nearly all cases of someone posting a news story on p&n they usualy provide a link so we who read the thread can see what source its from, because frankly too often when people have not provided a link the source is so bad it isnt even funny.

 
Back
Top