Zorba
Lifer
Because the car in the US is king, and all other forms of transportation are not our problem...Whose responsibility is the maintenance of the road the pavement is right next to and why can't they be maintained the same way?
Because the car in the US is king, and all other forms of transportation are not our problem...Whose responsibility is the maintenance of the road the pavement is right next to and why can't they be maintained the same way?
Every town and city I've ridden a bicycle in, it is technically illegal to ride on the sidewalks. I was never ticketed for it, but been stopped by police and warned to get on the street and off the sidewalk. This was on busy/dangerous streets, which is why I was on the sidewalk to begin with. I HAVE been ticketed for speeding though, on a single speed BMX bike nonetheless. The ticket was $50 iirc.
It's sad to say but around here, a car really is essential. My dead end street is pretty long and in all fairness, really should have been a thru street to the huge condo development. But we didn't want cars buzzing thru all day long. Kids toward the end can still play in the street though with virtually no worries. So I guess there are good and bad aspects to everything.The problem is we'll throw the full weight of the government behind subsidizing the car, but absolutely no other form of transportation. Why will the city fix a busted street, but not a sidewalk that is also in their right of way? Also because cities push the maintenance off on to others, the don't enforce strict construction standards and a lot of sidewalks are built like shit.
Narrow streets are a good thing for a neighborhood. It seems that engineering controls are the only thing that gets vehicles to slow down.- The issue is the roads are narrow and everyone parks on the street. So its almost one lane in the middle of the road a lot of times, and pedestrians, dog walkers, cyclists, and cars all have to share that cramped space.
A sidewalk would at least get the pedestrians and dog walkers off the road and free up space for everyone else.
Put bike lanes in the road gutter or in the door zone and it's no surprise people don't use them.Bike lanes are a waste of money because bikers never ride in them. They always manage to stay about six inches outside the line.
Narrow streets are a good thing for a neighborhood. It seems that engineering controls are the only thing that gets vehicles to slow down.
bicycledutch.wordpress.com

Bike lanes are a waste of money because bikers never ride in them. They always manage to stay about six inches outside the line.
I think Denmark and the Netherlands are always competeting for being the most bike friendly country. 🙂The Netherlands is about the only country that gets close to doing it right.
![]()
Europe’s longest cycling bridge opened
The new longest cycling bridge of Europe was opened one and a half weeks ago. A representative of the province of Groningen and the mayor of the municipality of Oldambt cut the ribbon together on 1…bicycledutch.wordpress.com
They build things like this
View attachment 83609
Whereas we get things like this
![]()
Crap cycle lanes
From amusing and pointless to downright dangerous lanes, the Warrington Cycle Campaign's book of Crap Cycle Lanes is notorious among cyclistswww.theguardian.com
![]()
I think Denmark and the Netherlands are always competeting for being the most bike friendly country. 🙂
So you agree they're a waste of money.That's because they are almost always shit. Full of lamp-posts, drain covers, parked cars, and broken glass.
Most things are if done wrong. A house without a roof or a car without wheels are also waste of money. 🙂So you agree they're a waste of money.
So you agree they're a waste of money.
From what I have seen a much larger concern is vehicles deciding to obstruct the bike lanes.Bike lanes are a waste of money because bikers never ride in them. They always manage to stay about six inches outside the line.
I got hurt one time bicycling in a bike lane when I was lulled into a dangerous situation. The bike lane at that point in the residential street was slowly narrowing and I didn't notice that fact. I was paying attention to my proximity to the lane marker which was on the left, of course. Meantime I was getting closer and closer to the parked cars and a lady suddenly swung open her parked car's driver's side door and I was struck by the door. I didn't fall but my hand was hurting real bad. She said something insensitive and I rode away smoking mad. It's a lesson, don't trust those bike lanes, widen your perspective and pay attention to what keeps you safe. I'm very seasoned, rarely get hurt, have never been seriously hurt on a bike. But a friend of mine years ago had to have his jaw wired together after being doored! I'm wearing a helmet these days because my physical therapist told me if I suffered a head injury on my bike my life might never be the same. I wear it skating too now. I always wear gloves, biking or skating.Absolutely. Crap cycle lanes are worse than useless, becuase often they are death-traps (built in door-zones, for example) yet motorists expect cyclists to use them and get dangerously angry when they don't.
(Cycle lanes that are 6 inches wide or placed in door zones are equivalent to putting a "entrance to the gift shop" sign on the door to the lion enclosure at the zoo - the 'road traffic engineers' who put such things in should be charged with attempted murder)
Sidewalk in front of my house had a dangerous ledge form because of being pushed up by a root of a city-owned tree between sidewalk and the street. I called the city and they put in a temporary ramp-fix of asphalt. I asked them if they could do a proper concrete fix and they said they would but only if I paid 1/2 the cost and to do so I'd have to get on a waiting list that takes maybe a couple years. I'm on the list. I should call them to remove that tree because it's ugly and literally 1/2 dead at this point and is a danger from it's falling limbs. I don't know how they will respond. They have trimmed that tree a time or two on their own. Maybe they would remove it, maybe put in a new decent tree. The one in front of my house is 1 on a 10 scale for tree-beauty.The problem is we'll throw the full weight of the government behind subsidizing the car, but absolutely no other form of transportation. Why will the city fix a busted street, but not a sidewalk that is also in their right of way? Also because cities push the maintenance off on to others, the don't enforce strict construction standards and a lot of sidewalks are built like shit.