LOLOL I TOTALLLY THOUGHT THE SAME THING.Wait a second, black people in London sound like black people in America? I thought they all had poofy accents over there, regardless of race. :hmm:
I honestly don't understand WTF he was talking about in the beginning about Angel vs Jinn. He sounds confused.
Actually, when I think about it, it sounds like he has some huge basic reading comprehension problems.
He went on about where the Quran's sacrifice for sin is, and how the lack of discussion on this topic is a problem to him; it shows that his perspective is locked in the Christian view simply because Original Sin does not exist in the Quran; there is no original sin.
He then said the Quran references that Paul is a prophet of God....which it doesn't.
His proof then that the Quran is wrong is because he references to the Bible lol. Reminds me of that circular logic pic that floats around lol. "The Quran is wrong because the Bible tells us...." Geez...even for someone who is religious, using one's text as direct truth to invalidate other scriptures in a discussion with others is absolutely stupid
IMO the guy is probably conflating NOI interpretations as the Quran itself.
That other Indian dude was clearly just as ignorant for sure as he should have easily been able to walk all over the arguments...which were entirely made up lol. Don't need to do much beyond, "Uh Dude, no it doesn't, you read wrong". The argument didn't even need to get to the level of arguing how to read and interpret....
The Indian even bites his lip and doesn't challange "Elijah Mohammed is the last prophet" comment- he is clearly confusing Elijah Mohammed with Prophet Mohammed lol; I'd bet $$$ he has no idea what the 'Nation of Islam' is...not surprising though considering its an African American thing.
Anyways I got bored at about 5 minutes because its a fictional discussion about what is going on, and both guys are pretty fucking stupid lol. I hope after getting owned, that Muslim goes home, reads up, and then learns exactly why everything the other guy said is either (a) wrong (b) entirely fictional (lol...fictionalizing what is already fiction, right?
