Both of you are wrong and u cant even get my nick correct, Chaintech have a good rep and rated higher than BFG, i got to laugh at that statement,
Here>>> Chaintech,bfg,evga,xfx, are but a few at 425/1100. Please anyone add more as there is but i cant mind of top of my head.
Get your facts backed up by urls befofe you open your mounth and let your belly rumble
😛
Learn to use
www.google.com and look at all review, BFG aint widely bought outside USA.
Running above so called Ultra speeds is not to hard,i had a chaintech replaced after 2 years and i even keep the original card and sold new one and fixed bug with a bios on original (yes nvidia bios not chaintechs)
I have nothing against BFG, but will never own one.
You were asked opinions and thats mine that Chaintech are better and i bet in tests its proven, im not the only peep here not to rate them apart from support with RMA.
>>> peleejosh, for you to say chaintech are crap shows your ignorance totally, as you know little, i havent said BFG are totally crap just i not rate them.
Why dont other makers claim 10% o/c on the core and memory as ive proven the spec for Ultra is min of 400/1000, and thats from Nvidia and the urls above are hardproof.
Do you all plan to keep your card so long anyhow, and lifetime warrently most has clauses so i would tread carefully.
Out all forums ive seen this had most flames and trolls and yes i am part that to.