Both of you are wrong and u cant even get my nick correct, Chaintech have a good rep and rated higher than BFG, i got to laugh at that statement,
Here>>> Chaintech,bfg,evga,xfx, are but a few at 425/1100. Please anyone add more as there is but i cant mind of top of my head.
Get your facts backed up by urls befofe you open your mounth and let your belly rumble
Learn to use
www.google.com and look at all review, BFG aint widely bought outside USA.
Running above so called Ultra speeds is not to hard,i had a chaintech replaced after 2 years and i even keep the original card and sold new one and fixed bug with a bios on original (yes nvidia bios not chaintechs)
I have nothing against BFG, but will never own one.
You were asked opinions and thats mine that Chaintech are better and i bet in tests its proven, im not the only peep here not to rate them apart from support with RMA.
>>> peleejosh, for you to say chaintech are crap shows your ignorance totally, as you know little, i havent said BFG are totally crap just i not rate them.
Why dont other makers claim 10% o/c on the core and memory as ive proven the spec for Ultra is min of 400/1000, and thats from Nvidia and the urls above are hardproof.
Do you all plan to keep your card so long anyhow, and lifetime warrently most has clauses so i would tread carefully.
Out all forums ive seen this had most flames and trolls and yes i am part that to.