BF2-SF screens

Polish3d

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
5,500
0
0
http://www.rootminus1.com/freepics/displayimage.php?album=lastup&cat=0&pos=0

See if that link works... but really, these pics are terrible... unless its something wrong with my drivers... all settings are on High w/ 4AA, TSAA, GC AA, HQ in nvidia control panel, all high in in game settings, 1680x1050

Also the pics actually dont even look as bad as the game itself, some of the detail lost makes it appear less pixelated than it actually is
 

Polish3d

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
5,500
0
0
btw, the game is buggy, performance is terrible, I'm talking nearly 50% of what I get in reg. Bf2... truly disappointed, and whats worse is they have a trailers saying "Everything you are about to see is 100% in game footage"


Not true...it's a pre-done video and my graphics def. look worse than they do
 

AznAnarchy99

Lifer
Dec 6, 2004
14,695
117
106
LoL as i predicted about EA and the expansion. Everyone is saying that this will fix everything and give everything fans have been asking for. As for the trailers, it was obvious that it wasnt in game if you played the original BF2
 

Nextman916

Golden Member
Aug 2, 2005
1,428
0
0
Actually everyone saw this coming....read the review at gamespot they said its full of buggs like we have been saying. This whole forum has been against purchasing SF due to the many unfixed buggs in bf2 still.
 

Polish3d

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
5,500
0
0
Yeah... EA can GF itself.... this was a total waste of money as far as I'm concerned. The new patch introduced MORE bugs, I cannot run the X-Fi setting in sound anymore, and the expansion pack is heinously bad
 

aatf510

Golden Member
Nov 13, 2004
1,811
0
0
I am not saying that the original BF2 is any good, well it's a fun game.. but there are something wrong with pretty much everything, and the expansion is just making matters worse plus I don't think the expansion is that much "fun" either.
 

Ackmed

Diamond Member
Oct 1, 2003
8,499
560
126
I downloaded it last night. Didnt play much, just tested out the new grapple and line.

What I like most about it is, it has a much bigger focus on infantry. I enjoy planes and choppers, but some maps have way too many. SP doesnt have near the amount. Also, the new flashbangs are pretty fun to throw.. and night vision is great. :)

edit, I got the same error as you did when I tried to install it. I dont have my games installed on C:\, but that didnt matter to it.. Had to make some space on C:\, to install it on D:\. Annoying, but oh well, it worked and now Im playing.
 

Polish3d

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
5,500
0
0
I actually had to end up reformatting both my HDDs just to make room on the C: drive which I no longer have partitioned as a system drive w/ 4 gigs >: /

lol
 

RampantAndroid

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2004
6,591
3
81
Yeah, I prefer a focus on infantry....and BF2 IS fun, don't get me wrong, but when force to rate it out of 10 stars, it'd give it 3-4 for FLARING problems (an launched grenade explodes at point blank...kills me, but not the guy who fired it at me, who is 3 feet away. Wow.)

They need to learn to optimize code a lot better....bf2 is too much of a resource hog, and the graphics are FAR from steller.
 

Ackmed

Diamond Member
Oct 1, 2003
8,499
560
126
Graphics arent stellar? I have to disagree with that. When settings are cranked up, I think it looks very good. I cant think of one game that is the same type, that has graphics as good as it. Huge maps, tons of people, planes, tanks, etc.

But yeah it has some bugs, but I still would give it a 8.5 or so. Its what I play 80% of the time. And as soon as I finish F.E.A.R. and CoD2, probably 95% of the time. :)
 

Fistandantilis

Senior member
Aug 29, 2004
845
0
0
I second that, EA can GF themselves with this and the original game (BF2, BF2-SF) HOWEVER, NFS-MW can out very nice in my very humble opinion.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Graphics arent stellar? I have to disagree with that. When settings are cranked up, I think it looks very good. I cant think of one game that is the same type, that has graphics as good as it. Huge maps, tons of people, planes, tanks, etc.

But yeah it has some bugs, but I still would give it a 8.5 or so. Its what I play 80% of the time. And as soon as I finish F.E.A.R. and CoD2, probably 95% of the time. :)

Are you enjoying FEAR? IMO its the best single player FPS out right now. I loved it!
 

Ackmed

Diamond Member
Oct 1, 2003
8,499
560
126
Yes, but I put playing it and CoD2 on hold. I stopped playing them about two weeks ago, wasnt getting good enough frames for my liking and config. So now I have a second GTX on the way, when it gets here.. I plan to resume them both.
 

DeathReborn

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,786
789
136
The SAS Uniforms are off, the G36K is capable of Single/Burst/Auto Fire Modes, you shouldn't be able to slide UP a rappel line... So many things wrong with it, tut tut EA.

BF2 I can run up to 16x12 on Medium-High, BF2: SF chugs along in 10x76 on Medium. I think htey rushed it out the door too quickly.
 

Chacranajxy

Member
Oct 18, 2005
142
0
0
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Graphics arent stellar? I have to disagree with that. When settings are cranked up, I think it looks very good. I cant think of one game that is the same type, that has graphics as good as it. Huge maps, tons of people, planes, tanks, etc.

But yeah it has some bugs, but I still would give it a 8.5 or so. Its what I play 80% of the time. And as soon as I finish F.E.A.R. and CoD2, probably 95% of the time. :)

Are you enjoying FEAR? IMO its the best single player FPS out right now. I loved it!

Until i can put together my new computer in a few days, I'm stuck with the demo on my current crappy computer. Everything about this game oozes quality. As in, this could easily become my favorite PC game of all time.