- Dec 13, 2000
- 4,362
- 11
- 81
I have mostly played BF2 for the last several years. I highly prefer the Desert Conflict mod over vanilla. But often when I am ready to play, the servers are empty. (Please visit the GFC Gaming site if you are at all interested in a game of BF2 capture the flag!)
I tried some COD4, but find the infantry only limits the fun somewhat, and the smaller maps makes it feel like I'm in the middle of an old Quake deathmatch. I prefer bigger maps and a little slower pace, because I feel it adds the ability to bring some strategy to bear. It's not just whoever twitches faster wins.
Anyway, I have both Frontlines: Fuel of War and Enemy Territiry: Quake Wars on my shelf. Ideally, I am looking for advice from a BF2 fan that has played both of these newer games, but if you have any exposure any of these games, your input is welcome.
Both of these new games seem to have a lot of classes/load-outs/vehicles to try out. As a fan of and experienced player of BF2, which of these new games do you think I should I invest my time in trying to learn first? Which do you think would be the most fun?
Thanks!
I tried some COD4, but find the infantry only limits the fun somewhat, and the smaller maps makes it feel like I'm in the middle of an old Quake deathmatch. I prefer bigger maps and a little slower pace, because I feel it adds the ability to bring some strategy to bear. It's not just whoever twitches faster wins.
Anyway, I have both Frontlines: Fuel of War and Enemy Territiry: Quake Wars on my shelf. Ideally, I am looking for advice from a BF2 fan that has played both of these newer games, but if you have any exposure any of these games, your input is welcome.
Both of these new games seem to have a lot of classes/load-outs/vehicles to try out. As a fan of and experienced player of BF2, which of these new games do you think I should I invest my time in trying to learn first? Which do you think would be the most fun?
Thanks!
