better OCer...

[PinchyCM]

which is better?

how high have people gotten on stock?

is it worth it for the extra 45-50 bucks for the 3200?

discuss

 

[iboomalot]

Originally posted by: PinchyCM

is it worth it for the extra 45-50 bucks for the 3200?

YES

 

[TheBDB]

Originally posted by: iboomalot

Originally posted by: PinchyCM

is it worth it for the extra 45-50 bucks for the 3200?

YES

NO

 

[PinchyCM]

3000+: 1
3200+: 1

Discuss some more.

 

[nick1985]

my vote if for the 3000

 

[Rapsven]

Lower cache chips have better OC capabilities.

 

[Markfw]

get the 3400+ newcastle

 

[John]

Originally posted by: Rapsven
Lower cache chips have better OC capabilities.

Both of the cpu's in question are most likely 512KB Newcastles. I would get the 3000+ and spend the ~50 on a better powersupply, more memory, better video, etc.

 

[PinchyCM]

Originally posted by: John

Originally posted by: Rapsven
Lower cache chips have better OC capabilities.

Both of the cpu's in question are most likely 512KB Newcastles. I would get the 3000+ and spend the ~50 on a better powersupply, more memory, better video, etc.

intrestin'....

i'm going to go with a gig of corsair pc3200, i have a 9800pro, and i won't upgrade till the 6800s or x800s drop in price. i might need a bigger psu, but we'll play that one by ear. i only have a 330W PSU, but that's not that big of a concern. i'm just not sure if the extra 50 bucks is worth it for the extra 200mhz.

how high have ppl gotten on stock?