I use Acronis True Image Home 2010 to create and restore images of my program disk. I never install Acronis but always run it from a DVD. When I had my programs on a HHD, I usually wrote the image over whatever was there. Sometimes, I formatted with a Windows 7 DVD before I wrote the image. I never did notice any difference as to whether formatting accomplished anything.
I now use an Intel X25M 120GB as my program drive. My programs account for about 35GB of the 111 GB available on the drive. I am running Win 7 x64 and Trim is operational.
I understand that SSD's have a lower number of write cycles than HHD's do, so I have used some restraint in replacing images.
Now the SSD questions:
Is quick formatting necessary? Or will Acronis' restored boot sector accomplish the same thing?
Does the "Secure Erase" included in Intel's Toolbox provide sufficient value, versus Quick Format, to justify the extra effort required to run it?
Acronis does recognize that the SSD is different. When I start a restore, a box pops up that states that there is data on the disk and some could be useful. It does not offer any choices as what do do with this "useful data". Acronis did not do this with a HHD.
I now use an Intel X25M 120GB as my program drive. My programs account for about 35GB of the 111 GB available on the drive. I am running Win 7 x64 and Trim is operational.
I understand that SSD's have a lower number of write cycles than HHD's do, so I have used some restraint in replacing images.
Now the SSD questions:
Is quick formatting necessary? Or will Acronis' restored boot sector accomplish the same thing?
Does the "Secure Erase" included in Intel's Toolbox provide sufficient value, versus Quick Format, to justify the extra effort required to run it?
Acronis does recognize that the SSD is different. When I start a restore, a box pops up that states that there is data on the disk and some could be useful. It does not offer any choices as what do do with this "useful data". Acronis did not do this with a HHD.