Maybe he's only talking about the first one?Originally posted by: aswedc
You didn't split up the MGS games.
Originally posted by: Sphexi
How can you compare two totally different games like X-Com and HL1? HL1 is a FPS, with very minor bits of puzzle solving in it, X-Com is RTS/turn-based combat, so very different. Hell, just for the amount of itme that each wasted of my life, X-Com is the winner.
Originally posted by: Howard
Maybe he's only talking about the first one?Originally posted by: aswedc
You didn't split up the MGS games.
Originally posted by: The Battosai
:thumbsup:Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
we need seeding!!!!
Originally posted by: KarmaPolice
Originally posted by: JujuFish
Oh, by the way, I nominate Alpha Centauri. That game is awesome.
I loved Civ1..I loved Civ2..heck I licked almost all civs including Colinization! Even with all of the games I have liked that have spawned from the likes of sid meirs..I hated alpha centauri..that was a horrible game.'
I remember how it went down. I get pcgamer every month(best pc mag ever)and they had a reivew for it. THey gave it some crazy score of like 96 or something...i think HL1 the best game ever rated by pcgamer is like a 98 i believe.(prob wrong by now).
Went out the store...got it right away..played it..thought it sucked..and i didnt just play it a little..I gave it all the chances it could.
I dont know why..I guess its just me..
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
Personally I wouldn't consider any of those games the "Best". 90% aren't even playable, IMO.
Originally posted by: clamum
This is a pretty good poll, but I don't agree with the new games being matched up against old classics. That doesn't seem like a fair comparison to me. The old ones have stood the test of time and it's much easier to see their influence now. It's hard to judge a new game against an old one.
Originally posted by: Eeezee
LOL you put MGS up against Doom 3? That's like putting a putting a T-Rex up against a cow with no legs.
