Best LCD 20" and over with 1600x1200

Betelgeuse

Junior Member
Aug 1, 2003
16
0
0
Been looking around for one for a long time. I bought the Samsung 213T but it was really bad in ghosting. Is there any LCD out there in 20"+ range that does 1600x1200 natively and is suitable for gaming as well? I know there's the Dell one (2000FP) but it's so bloody fugly. I've been looking at the NEC 2080UX panel but I can't find one locally to examine up close and personal. BTW, any stores in Toronto that have a good selection of LCDs on display?

 

mchammer187

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 2000
9,114
0
76
Originally posted by: Betelgeuse
Been looking around for one for a long time. I bought the Samsung 213T but it was really bad in ghosting. Is there any LCD out there in 20"+ range that does 1600x1200 natively and is suitable for gaming as well? I know there's the Dell one (2000FP) but it's so bloody fugly. I've been looking at the NEC 2080UX panel but I can't find one locally to examine up close and personal. BTW, any stores in Toronto that have a good selection of LCDs on display?[/i]

from the front i think the 2000FP looks great but from the back it could look better

still a great monitor IMO

<--------- have one paid $760 for it and absolutely do not regret buying it
 

Betelgeuse

Junior Member
Aug 1, 2003
16
0
0
Man that 2000FP is one fugly mofo, yuck. ;)

Persoanally, I've been eyeing the NEC LCD2080UX or one of the new Viewsonic models, either the VP201b which is 20" or the VP211b which is 21.3". All claim a response time of 25ms (Viewsonic told me the VP201b and 211b have 13/12 and 15/10 rise/fall), anyone have any experience with any of these? Any other recommendations?
TIA
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
How can anyone stand 1600x1200 its so fricken small. Not to mention some of the games will even be slow running at that even with your best graphics card!
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
11
81
Originally posted by: Tabb
How can anyone stand 1600x1200 its so fricken small. Not to mention some of the games will even be slow running at that even with your best graphics card!
1024:16 = 60dpi
1600:21 = 76dpi

Not that much of an increase, and anyway, if you're not playing the newest games like HL2 and Doom3, frames at 1600x1200 will be fine if you have an up-to-date video card.
 

zsouthboy

Platinum Member
Aug 14, 2001
2,264
0
0
Originally posted by: Tabb
How can anyone stand 1600x1200 its so fricken small. Not to mention some of the games will even be slow running at that even with your best graphics card!

You have no idea obviously...

1600x1200 is THE perfect resolution. Period. (I'd use it on a 17" monitor, and as for it being "small", you realize you can change the DPI setting in windows and everything is "big" again?)

1024x768 is the next 640x480....
 

cliftonite

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2001
6,900
63
91
Originally posted by: zsouthboy
Originally posted by: Tabb
How can anyone stand 1600x1200 its so fricken small. Not to mention some of the games will even be slow running at that even with your best graphics card!

You have no idea obviously...

1600x1200 is THE perfect resolution. Period. (I'd use it on a 17" monitor, and as for it being "small", you realize you can change the DPI setting in windows and everything is "big" again?)

1024x768 is the next 640x480....

how do you change the dpi settings?
 

Betelgeuse

Junior Member
Aug 1, 2003
16
0
0
Apart from the merits of 1600x1200 resolution, which one of these monitors would be suitable for general usage AND gaming (not I'd probably still keep my CRT for ultra-fast action games), the NEC LCD2080UX, the Viewsonic VP201b or VP211b?