Mind explaining what is the difference between the gs II and gs II X?
Everything is different http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=3621&idPhone2=4129
Mind explaining what is the difference between the gs II and gs II X?
If OP can wait this long he should get the Galaxy Nexus.
Oh........
Oh well.
In my (and a lot of other peoples) opinion, the Galaxy Nexus is an inferior phone to the GS2. Aside from the lack of an Exynos SoC, the fact that they are using a PenTile display instead of the the RGB array of the GS2's S-AMOLED Plus display is disappointing. And what's with stock Android not supporting UMTS video calling (unless this has been fixed in ICS)? (There are a multitude of other reasons, but they are ones that come down to personal taste or opinion).
They have very different purposes and they are flagship devices for different companies. The Galaxy Nexus is Google's flagship, and it is supposed to be the software flagship for Android. Hardware-wise, it is a reference device. The GSII is Samsung's flagship, and is supposed to be the most killer hardware on the market. Google made decisions about the Nexus in regards to where Android is headed. The choice in processor, GPU, NFC, barometer, gyroscope, etc. were Google's trade-offs, where as Samsung went for raw power, and maximizing the potential of the current (2.3) version of Android.
edit: I forgot to mention the screen, which was one of your original points. The Nexus is 720p, which is the new hardware reference for Android 4.0+. 720p was either not possible or too expensive at the time in a SAMOLED+ display, and it was another trade-off. Honestly, though, I cannot see any pixels or RGB matrices at all, with the high pixel density it has.
The S2 has a better speaker, at least out of the box, but the Nexus is way ahead on headphone output.I personally find the specs on the gs2 to be better, other than res the gs2 has, imo, a better camera and sound, both which are important to me.
The S2 has a better speaker, at least out of the box, but the Nexus is way ahead on headphone output.
Actually someone over at xda did an analysis of the chip used with high quality headphone and found that the s2 had the better dac. Caveat - this was for the european version; no clue if samsung change the dac on the various usa models (at/t, sprint, tmobile).
no they didn't. supercurio has panned S2 poor quality sound from the beginning. supercurio is in France so he had the European model. He said the same on his Anandtech sound review of the internation Galaxy SII.
no they didn't. supercurio has panned S2 poor quality sound from the beginning. supercurio is in France so he had the European model. He said the same on his Anandtech sound review of the internation Galaxy SII.
no they didn't. supercurio has panned S2 poor quality sound from the beginning. supercurio is in France so he had the European model. He said the same on his Anandtech sound review of the internation Galaxy SII.
Interesting. I own the vibrant and tmos gs2 and i find the sound quality to be quite good. In fact i think it sounds better than the vibrant on my higher end headphones. I use poweramp on both as the builtin app stinks.
