Benghazi Suspect Said He Was Moved To Take Revenge For American-Made Video

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,950
33,606
136
Benghazi attack suspect Ahmed Abu Khattala, who was captured by U.S. forces on Sunday, told people the move against the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya was intended as revenge for an American-made online video that was seen as an attack to Islam, according to the New York Times.

So we capture the head guy and he says it was actually the video? So how long before Fox News and the rest of the right wing echo chamber (same group) claim this means nothing, Hilary orchestrated this too??

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/17/benghazi-suspect-video_n_5505181.html
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,386
32
91
If terrorists are covering for Obama, what more proof do we need that they fear True Patriots will win the White House in 2016?
Vote Republican or the terrorists win.
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,386
32
91
Khattala wanted a Muslim theocracy in Libya, same as Obama wants for America. It's no wonder they're in bed together.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
36,467
10,749
136
  1. An organized terrorist attack is not a protest.
  2. He had no media access these past two years, to learn of the controversy and milk it?
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
So we capture the head guy and he says it was actually the video? So how long before Fox News and the rest of the right wing echo chamber (same group) claim this means nothing, Hilary orchestrated this too??http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/17/benghazi-suspect-video_n_5505181.html

I saw the thread title and was just coming over here to predict that the Republicans will try to claim that our intelligence organizations are fabricating this or somehow coercing this guy into saying that. It's a huge cow patty dropped on the Republlicans' faces.
 

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
I saw the thread title and was just coming over here to predict that the Republicans will try to claim that our intelligence organizations are fabricating this or somehow coercing this guy into saying that. It's a huge cow patty dropped on the Republlicans' faces.

LOL
 

schmuckley

Platinum Member
Aug 18, 2011
2,335
1
0
This is cooked up propaganda.
It's all too neat and convenient.
Where's the other 10?
 
Last edited:

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
so it was the video, then it wasn't the video, and now its the video again.

Obama should just shut down youtube so that no islamist is offended ever again.
 

TerryMathews

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,464
2
0
I saw the thread title and was just coming over here to predict that the Republicans will try to claim that our intelligence organizations are fabricating this or somehow coercing this guy into saying that. It's a huge cow patty dropped on the Republlicans' faces.
Okay so let's think this through logically. First off it's a ridiculous assertion to assume that the administration couldn't be coercing his statement it could be as simple as offering him some sort of deal. Secondly and far more importantly this is a man who is allegedly working again American interests. To assume that he would simply tell the truth instead of making a statement that furthers his goals is ridiculous. These people are not as stupid as some of us assume they are. He knows full well that the most disruptive thing he could say in this moment will be to confirm what the Democrats always said and deny want the Republicans always said that will only increase the level of divisiveness in this country as this post clearly shows.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
Lol, and just as you would suspect, gullible fools will lap this garbage up, exactly as the NYT and others carrying the water for the white house knew they would.
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,188
9,724
146
Lol, and just as you would suspect, gullible fools will lap this garbage up, exactly as the NYT and others carrying the water for the white house knew they would.

So how do you feel about the fools on the other side of the fence who dismiss things outright that fit their ideology without expressing any desire to see if there is validity?
 

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,672
136
Okay so let's think this through logically.......

.....He knows full well that the most disruptive thing he could say in this moment will be to confirm what the Democrats always said and deny want the Republicans always said that will only increase the level of divisiveness in this country as this post clearly shows.

Woa there cowboy thats a stewox stretch there by a mile lol. Sorry stew~ How do you know what he thinks?
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
It's all a liberal coverup. Hillary planned the attack personally.

Read on Drudge & Infowars this guy is actually Hillary's and Vince Foster's love child, that's why the Clinton's murdered Foster and exiled the child to be raised by jihadis (Obama's in-laws) in Somalia.

All too perfect and you sheeple are falling for it again..
 

highland145

Lifer
Oct 12, 2009
43,973
6,340
136
Do we really care? Did he actually say it, was he telling the truth? What I care about is if our people asked for help, it could have saved them and help was refused for whatever reason.



Edit:
Hillary Clinton, in a sit-down interview with Fox News, suggested Tuesday that she had doubts from the outset about whether the Benghazi terror attack was triggered by a protest over an anti-Islam film -- though her State Department pushed that narrative for days.
"This was the fog of war," Clinton said, when asked about the administration's controversial public explanation of the attack.
"My own assessment careened from the video had something to do with it, the video had nothing to do with it -- it may have affected some people, it didn't affect other people," she said in the interview with Fox News' Bret Baier and Greta Van Susteren.
Clinton added: "There's no doubt terrorists were involved."
 
Last edited:

justoh

Diamond Member
Jun 11, 2013
3,686
81
91
This can't be significant. It was never reasonable to take issue with attributing the attack to the video, even if mistaken, so why would they respond reasonably to any evidence that it actually was due to the video.
 

schmuckley

Platinum Member
Aug 18, 2011
2,335
1
0
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/17/benghazi-suspect-video_n_5505181.html
bs-meter.gif
 
Last edited: