Benchmarks that suck...! Post`em here

[Bartman39]

This is for your worst 3dMark2000 benchmark (be realistic), also no less than a 500mhz processor and or an 8meg PCI or AGP video card. (this is just to see the difference between gerbals, hamsters & the throughbreads of the video world)

Celeron II 533a @800mhz
128megs PC100 Cas2 ram
Matrox G200 8meg AGP

3dMark2000.......806 (I`d buy that for a dollar)

BTW the wife did not think it was funny when I took out her V3 3K and put this G200 in... now has a TNT2 so I dont sleep on the sofa anymore

 

[Goi]

Doh, I read your topic and thought that it meant just that - benchmarks that suck!
I was gonna say the Norton System Information benchmark since it rates my C850 just slightly above a P2-450, and my WD Expert 7200 as "mid range", which is BS.
Guess you meant "benchmark results that suck!"

 

[Bartman39]

What the heck post all your benchmarks that suck... what ever they are (the program itself or the result...)

 

[nippyjun]

3dmarks2000 sucks. It shows nothing.

 

[Shagga]

SiSoft Sandra Memory Benchmarks. 324/376 and thats on my current systems setup. Judging by what everyone else seems to be getting, mine SUX bigtime.

 

[Goi]

Shagga, you'd be surprised. My C566@875.5 only does 309/356(MB/s) on Sandra Millennium