Benchmarking Unreal Tournament 2003's Demo

[Wingznut]

Flyby: 136
Botmatch: 66

P4-2.8ghz, 512mb DDR333, GF4 Ti4200... All at default.

 

[splice]

Athlon XP 1800+ on an 8KHA+
640MB DDR266
MSI GF4 TI-4400
Win2K SP3

all stock speeds

1024x768
flyby: 136
Botmatch: 47

 

[MIGhunter]

Here are my benchmarks including alternate resolutions. I thought that it would go down a lot more than it did.

1024x768
Flyby: 200.307907
Botmatch 70.652313

1280x960
Flyby: 163.704193
Botmatch 70.252090

1600x1200
Flyby: 156.627594
Botmatch 66.996689

 

[Leo V]

1024x768x32: 153.3FPS / 67.1FPS (using nvidia 40.41 drivers, 30.82 may be faster.)

Taken with P4/2.26B @ 2.62ghz (1.50Vcore) on P4B533, 616fsb, 412ddr cas2, Gainward ti4200 128MB @ 320/595mhz.

These are my max 100%-stable (error-free) frequencies, I systematically reduce my everyday usage frequencies to 97% of the above.

 

[MIGhunter]

How did you copy the window?

 

[Legendary]

Originally posted by: MIGhunter
How did you copy the window?

Printscreen then crop?

 

[WyteWatt]

Anyone here plays unreal 2003 at 1600x1200 with all details on maximum ? Just wondering.

 

[Rand]

Originally posted by: imtim83
Anyone here plays unreal 2003 at 1600x1200 with all details on maximum ? Just wondering.

From the looks of it MigHunter's system may be able to pull it off. 2.8GHz NW + R9700... if he overclocked it should be a pretty safe bet he'd manage nice frame rates at 1600x1200 given what he's already posting.

 

[WyteWatt]

I play unreal 2003 in all maps at 1600x1200 with all details on maximum. It looks really nice at this resolution. But i could live with one resolution below or even 1024x768 if i had to.

 

[fluxquantum]

okay here are my results from an overclocked system:

Flyby: 108
Botmatch: 49

Resolution: 1024x768

With a Pentium 4 1.6(a) @ 1.8
GeForce 3 Ti-200 @ 225/500

 

[Leo V]

Originally posted by: Legendary

Originally posted by: MIGhunter
How did you copy the window?

Printscreen then crop?

Alt+PrintScreen copies the active window, no need for cropping.

 

[amdskip]

Flyby: 602
Botmatch: 23.555

This is just the family computer
900 Thunderbird
Geforce 3 ti200

 

[NOX]

Originally posted by: amdskip
Flyby: 602
Botmatch: 23.555

This is just the family computer
900 Thunderbird
Geforce 3 ti200

?????? :Q:frown:

 

[VBboy]

This is truly pointless as everyone is using different FSAA, Anisotropic Filtering, Mip-Mapping and texture settings! Let alone the different options in the game itself. It's like saying "My 2.5 Ghz PC scores 400. What about yours?"...

 

[WyteWatt]

NOX i bet amdskip meant 102 on flyby and not 602. Its impossible to be 602 because not even the ATI 9700 pro gets that lol. It will be a while till we get 602. Like NV40 and R400 maybe even beyond that till we get 602.

 

[Leo V]

I'm sure almost everyone (including myself) used default settings. amdskip could have skipped a decimal point by accident

 

[WyteWatt]

Leo V true. That may be it. Seems like that is what happen.

 

[MIGhunter]

Originally posted by: Leo V

Originally posted by: Legendary

Originally posted by: MIGhunter
How did you copy the window?

Printscreen then crop?

Alt+PrintScreen copies the active window, no need for cropping.

How do you do alt+printscreen?

 

[ProviaFan]

Originally posted by: MIGhunter

Originally posted by: Leo V

Originally posted by: Legendary

Originally posted by: MIGhunter
How did you copy the window?

Printscreen then crop?

Alt+PrintScreen copies the active window, no need for cropping.

How do you do alt+printscreen?

While holding down the "ALT" key (find it on your keyboard next to the space bar), you press the key that says "Print Scrn / SysReq" (it's next to the "Scroll Lock" key, in the group of three keys next to the LEDs in the upper-right corner of your keyboard). A picture of the active window will now be in Windows' internal clipboard. Now go into an imaging application and paste.

 

[Markfw]

OK. I have an XP2000 with an abit KX7333 and 256 meg PC2700 and a retail Radeon 8500. NO o/c'ing How are these scores from the benchmark file ? (I can't compare these to what everybody is posting, maybe I missed something) I am running 1280x1024

4.861158 / 37.579651 / 66.207710 fps -- Score = 37.597092 rand[28881]
7.204523 / 37.286495 / 67.103134 fps -- Score = 37.305450 rand[28881]
7.000575 / 54.120750 / 105.821518 fps -- Score = 54.127071 rand[11570]
5.781134 / 40.928585 / 109.850952 fps -- Score = 40.943233 rand[3880]
7.973570 / 40.922070 / 88.627594 fps -- Score = 40.977440 rand[29710]
36.535679 / 99.859421 / 291.272949 fps -- Score = 99.910446 rand[21984]
9.031074 / 119.780075 / 259.678314 fps -- Score = 119.873482 rand[5909]
30.172241 / 88.251411 / 205.253937 fps -- Score = 88.415878 rand[6878]

Does this compare ?? It looked like I compare to WingnutPez 2.8 gig P4 and 4200 at stock, but maybe I am using the wrong numbers. Somebody please explain which numbers they are all using.

 

[CrazySaint]

Is there any way to run just the flyby or just the botmatch?

 

[Sub51]

Flyby: 54
Botmatch: 18

PIII 850 / Geforce 2 *sigh*

 

[BFG10K]

1600 x 1200 x 32, everything on high except shadows disabled.
16x fast anisotropic filtering.
FSAA, trueform, vsync disabled
System specs below.

Botmatch Antalus 52.7
Botmatch Anubis 92.6
Botmatch Asbestos 75.6
Botmatch Citadel 51.7
Flybuy Antalus 74.6
Flybuy Asbestos 112.9
Flybuy Citadel 69.5