Benchmarking Unreal Tournament 2003's Demo

[Budman]

8500LE 250/200

 

[GT1999]

Originally posted by: BlindSeaman
Is it me or are these low scores for my system?

System:
1gig Duron
384mb PC133
Ti4200 @4400 clock/memory

Flyby: 75
Botmatch: 24

Resolution: 1024x768

I'm starting to think its time for a new mobo/processor

Yes a little low. I'm on a TBird 1.1 w/ 512MB, GF3 Ti200 stock speeds and I'm getting 29/77 at 1024x768.

 

[ProviaFan]

800MHz AMD Duron, 256MB PC/133, ATI Radeon VE

800x600 @ 32 bit color

Flyby: 22.481577
Botmatch: 9.610631

 

[NOX]

1024x768

Flyby: 142
Botmatch: 60

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73.542969 / 107.730507 / 491.997864 fps -- Score = 107.762962

74.393021 / 176.953995 / 520.542114 fps -- Score = 177.142929

24.636126 / 48.255005 / 91.050491 fps -- Score = 48.279327

28.861988 / 72.325706 / 137.071457 fps -- Score = 72.365402

P4 2.26
Gainward Ti4200 (275/540)

 

[Chad]

Windows XP SP1
Pentium 4 1.6a @ 2.4
Original GeForce 3 @ 250 core 520 memory.
Epox 4g4a motherboard @ 150 (600 effective) fsb
512 megs Kingmax PC400 DDR ram @ 374 Cas 2.5 turbo timings
Hercules Game Theatre XP (latest drivers)
All options details and sounds maxed and 1024x768x32

Flyby - 110.263336 fps
Botmatch - 60.629368 fps

All while running AVG antivirus in the background, ICQ Lite, MM5, 3 IE browsers open, Outlook open and Explorer open.

 

[MIGhunter]

God, I love my new computer.

1024x768
Flyby: 200.307907
Botmatch 70.652313

BTW, this is the 1st time that it worked. Right before that my computer rebooted. Everytime before that I got some error. Anyone else have this problem.

 

[fluxquantum]

cool. i did not know you could do this. thanks. i will post my score afterwards.

 

[fluxquantum]

my cpu is not overclocked: 1.6(a)

1024x768

Flyby: 96
Botmatch: 44

 

[Rectalfier]

DeathStar:
108.00
63.92

Endor:
87
35

Looks like the Flyby is fillrate limited, and the botmatch is CPU limited. If I crank up the resolution on either one, the botmatch score remains the same.

 

[NOX]

Originally posted by: MIGhunter
God, I love my new computer.

1024x768
Flyby: 200.307907
Botmatch 70.652313

BTW, this is the 1st time that it worked. Right before that my computer rebooted. Everytime before that I got some error. Anyone else have this problem.

WOW... that system would be banned in my State.

 

[Doctorweir]

Ok, here it comes:

Setup see below...all 1024x768

Without everything: 125/47
2xAA & 2xAF: 74/43
QxAA & 1xAF: 105/46 <=perfect setup for me, even 1xAF pays, looks far better than without AF. Quincunx AA consumes only 1 Frame compared to 2xAA, so I stick with that

 

[jbahseng]

flyby = 99.799332
botmatch = 42.516647
XP1600 @ 1763 (10.5 x 166 MHz) with MSI KT3 Ultra2 + 256 Mb Crucial 2700 DDR ram and Radeon 8500LE 64 MB (250/275 MHz).

 

[OvErHeAtInG]

Flyby: 96.94
Botmatch: 38.86

Athlon T-bird 1.2 @ 1350
GF3 Ti200 @ 200/470

Anyone else think the Botmatch is seriously CPU limited? If I turn up my vidcard OC the Botmatch score goes down... turned on the Quincunx AA, got 53/38. Yikes!!

 

[Doctorweir]

Jup, botmatch is CPU limited...
Mighty intelligent bots

 

[Mavrick007]

Flyby: 127
Botmatch: 49
(1024x768)

Amd Athlon XP1900+
Soltek SL-75DRV4
512Meg PC2100 Crucial
MSI GF4 Ti4400
All stock

noticed lower benches in overclock of video core/ram as well..

 

[oldfart]

Flyby: 158.65
Botmatch: 62.87
(1024x768)

System:
1.6A @ 2.4 GHz
EPOX 4BDA2+ (i845D)
512mb @ DDR400
Ti4600 @ 315/715

EDIT: I just noticed the advanced settings menu works the same as UT does. Pull down the console with the ~ key and type preferences. You will have many more options to play with including setting detail levels higher than the "normal" that is available through the standard menu. I have to play with them to see if they actually do anything.

 

[kursplat]

@1200x1600 @1024x768 quality
flyby 46.9 flyby 98.2
bot 30.5 bot 47.4
winxp AMD 1900+ soyo dragon+ geforce3 ti200 and 1 gig of memory
nothing overclocked right now. this was with xp's visual effects set to best quality , so i reran the 1024 test at best performance and got
@1024x768 performance
flyby 98.3
bot 47.7
going to clock the vid card and see what i can get.

 

[pm]

Mighty intelligent bots

Try playing them in "Bomber Run". Even in Adept skill, they pretty much stink at it. The AI is pretty good overall - which is a hard balance to achieve between the AI being inhumanly good (particularly with the sniper rifle/lightning gun) and being totally stupid. I'm impressed with the Bot AI overall. But I was very surprised at their skill (or lack thereof) at the Bomber Run game.

 

[NOX]

Was Anand using this tool for his UT2003/video card benchmarks?

 

[JoPalm]

Fly-by: 108
Botmatch: 40
@1024

Athlon XP 1700+
512 PC2100
Radeon 8500 64MB stock

 

[fkloster]

1024x768 all detail...

Flyby: 204
botmatch: 70

 

[ProviaFan]

Originally posted by: NOX
Was Anand using this tool for his UT2003/video card benchmarks?

No. He's using a beta version of the real game (presumably with the high res textures and the rest).

 

[Mavrick]

67
29

At 800x600 (max detail though... well except for detail textures... :|

1 GHz Athlon with GF2 GTS

 

[NOX]

Originally posted by: fkloster
1024x768 all detail...

Flyby: 204
botmatch: 70

Oh stop bragging!

 

[MIGhunter]

I am glad to see someone get up there. I thought that maybe something weird was going on. I hit 200 at 70. Everyone else seemed slow. I guess that the 2.8 CPU with 1024 of Rambus helps.