Benchmark Request - 785G/790GX/Geforce 210

[IntelUser2000]

Could anyone run the following benchmark please?

Crysis Warhead

-DX10
-1280x1024
-Athlon II X3/X4, Phenom II range
-All Low

Specifically asking for users that have AMD 785G, 790GX, Nvidia Geforce 210, Radeon 4350, or any card in that range. Please state if any overclocking has been done.

Thank you.

 

[Rifter]

If i have time later today ill pull my 4890 and run it with my 790GX assuming thats even possible, but do you really expect even twin digit numbers in crysis with onboard GPU???

 

[Rifter]

Just noticed you are in BC, where abouts, im in surrey.

 

[IntelUser2000]

If i have time later today ill pull my 4890 and run it with my 790GX assuming thats even possible, but do you really expect even twin digit numbers in crysis with onboard GPU???

Oh yea definitely. I'm expecting somewhere around 15-25 fps depending on config/core clock settings. I realize not all people can do all settings/configs so more results, the better it is. Settings I'd prefer to be exact, but again, more results the better.

Just noticed you are in BC, where abouts, im in surrey.

Haha, I live in Surrey too. Used to live in the Guildford region, but moved a bit from there.

 

[Rifter]

I wll be home in a few hours (4) and will run some benches for you. Crysis is getting to be a old game now but still so demanding on your system. Always like doing benches on it because it stresses your system so much

I have contemplated adding a second 4890 to my system just for that game, since at 1080P 4xAA it slows below 20FPS for me sometimes if all hell is braking loose on the screen.

Ill run some benches with my 4890 first for comparison lol. Then ill yank it and run 2 for you with the 790GX, one with my CPU OC and one at stock clock, just to see if CPU will make a diff with a crappy GPU.

You want low settings right? ill run it with low then high for comparison, you want only that res 1280x1024 or any others?

Check back in 8 hours for results

I live right besdie surrey central skytrain, its funny everyone hates surrey but i dont mind it at all.

 

[Rifter]

Results:

1280x1024 low setting, cpu stock and 4890 running stock

Frost level
Min: 91
AVG: 129

1280x1024 low setting, cpu @3.6 stock and 4890 running 1000/1150
Frost level
Min: 96
AVG: 137

1280x1024 low setting, cpu stock and onboard 790GX with 128MB sideport
Frost level
Min: 13
AVG: 22

1280x1024 low setting, cpu@3.6 and onboard 790GX with 128MB sideport
Frost level
Min: 14
AVG: 24


Would not run high settings with 790GX would not run the benchmark.

Hope that helped, BTW i actually played it with the 790GX after running the benchmarks and i would not want to do it, however it is BARELY PLAYABLE, and i mean barely, at 800x600 low setting with the 790GX

 

[IntelUser2000]

It's quite a beautiful looking game though, funny none of the games can still catch up to the original Crysis.

I think DX10 lowers results quite a bit.

 

[Rifter]

Probably does lower it, didnt think of running it in dx9 mode since you said you wanted dx10 numbers.

I know running it in dx9 mode gets better FPS than dx10 on my 4890.

 

[IntelUser2000]

Hey, so I managed to ask you if you really ran with my original request without making it sound like I'm nagging.

DX9 should manage around 30 fps I think.

Surrey is not bad, if you don't live around Whalley, or so I hear about that place.

 

[Rifter]

did you want dx9 numbers? i thought you wanted it in dx10?

 

[IntelUser2000]

No, I was just joking.

Thanks.

 

[Rifter]

Lol good, you arnt really going to buy something like a 790GX and game on it are you?

If you do just dont play crysis, its a brutal game that frost level even makes my 4890 cry at 1080p with 4 xAA Gamer detail it drops into the high 20's sometimes.

The 790GX would probably do ok on older games, or even new games that arnt so demanding.